From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8D9C282CE for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEB9248E7 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:53:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559634815; bh=9emo8j3eiI3b+0WLGKEuRArCF2RDMpfdSz8HANQVqzQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=pJ8CZigGSgYQefNxnP7ycLlEfbcUdvmhSO5CfX3iYN+/jTjOYCj8P2pR1J25MXkM5 7AEzFaVCIFWhi4qD54goPOtwtiFReTPSL5Z57FR/SzP74Lht0NNopURArxVvviLzTh jcPWFmVodXx870faLNrTVqhhTjIdg56A0mIOUzhE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726806AbfFDHxe (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:53:34 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50390 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726792AbfFDHxe (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:53:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0F362423F; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:53:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559634814; bh=9emo8j3eiI3b+0WLGKEuRArCF2RDMpfdSz8HANQVqzQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M32pjFRfQYyLWTkEWr5wo6ABBmp2QAu72EhRgD4wPj74/08CIxpNhkbmguvsfiRWG VARX9jnH03vP7ps6uQc7dUoEKm4mIGAarfYbtrHiXYEe6dSa3/v3XRsUlNyGRMrdRA Rj+Y/v7E6/WusaOQSjmLF6sv0lIUGXkOLuC/EOBY= Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:53:32 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Zubin Mithra Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, groeck@chromium.org, blackgod016574@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net Subject: Re: 425aa0e1d015 ("ip_sockglue: Fix missing-check bug in ip_ra_control()") Message-ID: <20190604075332.GE6840@kroah.com> References: <20190603230239.GA168284@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190603230239.GA168284@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:02:40PM -0700, Zubin Mithra wrote: > Hello, > > CVE-2019-12381 was fixed in the upstream linux kernel with the commit :- > * 425aa0e1d015 ("ip_sockglue: Fix missing-check bug in ip_ra_control()") > > Could the patch be applied in order to v4.19.y, v4.14.y, v4.9.y and v4.4.y ? Same comments here as on the ipv6 bug. Should I just go create CVEs for every single stable kernel patches? Actually, it's been often suggested that I should, just to drive the point home... thanks, greg k-h