All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	<bjorn.topel@intel.com>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	<ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 18:43:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604184306.362d9d8e@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190603163852.2535150-2-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:38:51 -0700
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> wrote:

> Currently, the AF_XDP code uses a separate map in order to
> determine if an xsk is bound to a queue.  Instead of doing this,
> have bpf_map_lookup_elem() return the queue_id, as a way of
> indicating that there is a valid entry at the map index.

Just a reminder, that once we choose a return value, there the
queue_id, then it basically becomes UAPI, and we cannot change it.

Can we somehow use BTF to allow us to extend this later?



I was also going to point out that, you cannot return a direct pointer
to queue_id, as BPF-prog side can modify this... but Daniel already
pointed this out.
-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-04 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-03 16:38 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/2] Better handling of xskmap entries Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-03 16:38 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-04 14:54   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-06-04 15:30     ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-06-04 16:43   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2019-06-04 17:25     ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-04 18:12       ` Martin Lau
2019-06-05  8:45         ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-05 15:42           ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-04 18:18       ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-04 20:07       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-06-03 16:38 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: remove qidconf and better support external bpf programs Jonathan Lemon
2019-06-04  6:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/2] Better handling of xskmap entries Björn Töpel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190604184306.362d9d8e@carbon \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.