From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B05C28CC5 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 21:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D76E2075B for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 21:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="bA0CKpMO" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726535AbfFEVU1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 17:20:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:44752 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726510AbfFEVU0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 17:20:26 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id n2so22646pgp.11 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:20:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cbSNX6Rtq6xgkNTyw8B4sm3beoNnOfKEeukM3sDO+IE=; b=bA0CKpMOuTL8Y8LhFO/IeHVomPpIS8AtGZw3EP/UDhOLHCT/8aDT3fs30kyHtqBpHx 6q8RHl1CbJnYXGjyC/3UhR0rChzmdqcegMm7RkY2yrnY4O1DEVqzkwfCZ5bdd0yVNdnA sAfhSsM+gSI6ILdxaSkY3DlIn/CSvNZB/q/Ew08XgSxJCoGytGqJexKnbRo79LvQ022N OtG+79ytL842FSuiDZswVfMViNrT5Uf2p4d3mFUCkTdRXGInen4v12eUUtrsao4UZ3f5 6QkPwLkzG7yJyYVDQjqNJ0fWc2TONnB00scR1otaIMCfmdcgsGWg4tAYgYStHdzYZ2x+ Rl2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cbSNX6Rtq6xgkNTyw8B4sm3beoNnOfKEeukM3sDO+IE=; b=n9ZWIQIRyM0IP4Og5Nrw221p+CvuL51OASj9XtkfnbAaYacyIPTdNgkzjRBp1pOaTx KLdXaoGUlp4alV66Gy5QeSXA8wJ+/tLh2gdiAeKqi0rj2//11dRtl2UD0bg0XzpP6YfJ vL80JJA2IMFrlH/aKPZtd7YwlWlJJauS5mK59UhI9GLaM4Dz5nDu6mmM3j3saB6wC4kE h3C2nRo6/S2FV8Uo25uuoL0Qp+AZCxGbBAkjmHoTixG0mlnZAiPlYDKJAtolw9fPCUaY Dnfzhopk8pXVCti0L6v2g4JldGK4MY+oP87d63K4SABjSkKTPOZctE4+2htbJXM9pNq3 0egw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVV3yfdzwKJHEeUv3/iZsXZ1ZzPOq0kn9+qOVDZ60Nj76uws3JA 5WzxtPz2w1HeG4dTlgtsFf7RPy1Yeto= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZitJoRGelzSbSpcT25jvfTuWBHAaXphn8TImPNCrJZYSK6JjkbR81/MF9LsMtiDsNLhMUTA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:650c:: with SMTP id i12mr47893479pjj.44.1559769626247; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d24sm4340pjv.24.2019.06.05.14.20.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 14:20:24 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] revert async probing of VMBus scsi device Message-ID: <20190605142024.1589a7b4@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190605192647.GA25034@infradead.org> References: <20190605185205.12583-1-sthemmin@microsoft.com> <20190605185637.GA31439@infradead.org> <20190605120640.00358689@hermes.lan> <20190605190722.GA19684@infradead.org> <20190605121020.1a41b753@hermes.lan> <20190605192647.GA25034@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-hyperv-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:26:47 -0700 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:10:20PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > Sure. But they should not get a way out for just one specific driver. > > > > There are people running new kernels on 6 year old distributions. > > Was every distribution smart enough then? If you think so, then > > this not necessary. > > I think you are missing my point. If we want a way to disable this, > we: > > a) want it opt-in > b) it needs to for the whole SCSI layer and not just one driver Based on feedback from the Program Manager who handles the distros the patch for storvsc is not needed. SCSI device naming was never deterministic anyway. Cloud-init relies on the same mechanism as the Azure agent to detect the OS and ephemeral disk.