From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Carmeli Tamir <carmeli.tamir@gmail.com>,
Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@gmail.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: emxx_udc: fix warning "sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:51:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190606105108.GL31203@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605063443.GA5248@hari-Inspiron-1545>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:04:43PM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:04:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:24:12AM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > > Knowing the fact that operator '|' is faster than '+'.
> > > Its better we replace + with | in this case.
> > >
> > > Issue reported by coccicheck
> > > drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h:94:34-35: WARNING: sum of probable
> > > bitmasks, consider |
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h
> > > index b8c3dee..88d6bda 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h
> > > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int vbus_irq;
> > > #define BIT30 0x40000000
> > > #define BIT31 0x80000000
> >
> > All of those BITXX defines should be removed and the "real" BIT(X) macro
> > used instead.
> Yes will send separate patch to address this.
> >
> > > -#define TEST_FORCE_ENABLE (BIT18 + BIT16)
> > > +#define TEST_FORCE_ENABLE (BIT18 | BIT16)
> >
> > It really doesn't matter, a good compiler will have already turned this
> > into a constant value so you really do not know if this is less/faster
> > code or not, right?
> >
> > Did you look at the output to verify this actually changed anything?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Ok . Treating this as false postive from coccicheck.
I liked the patch. | is way more normal and readable than +. It's just
the commit message was bogus.
I would be very surprised if this coccicheck found anything that wasn't
a compile time constant like this.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-06 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-03 18:54 [PATCH] Staging: emxx_udc: fix warning "sum of probable bitmasks, consider |" Hariprasad Kelam
2019-06-03 19:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-05 6:34 ` Hariprasad Kelam
2019-06-06 10:51 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190606105108.GL31203@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=carmeli.tamir@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hariprasad.kelam@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishadkamdar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.