From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F15C2BCA1 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC162064A for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Qhq/mLyL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730347AbfFGQ1Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:27:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:33689 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729986AbfFGQ1Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:27:24 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x15so1500988pfq.0; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:27:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XeJqlljc/DcLq2LdbRfl+U/1KHhpI1pBfv141U86JNE=; b=Qhq/mLyLAI7Qa/kMeTNNjcQ72HN58L7rQT+3pEMsGf8qr7lbiVkMDxcOlOwsStT3xO 64KGhtkoeSzULWWdF3jK5PyizRW2chVl8nJMYGm7F/oYJbjzgHsXKTDFGkOwZFmXJnv/ rID8nW7NexiZ2capUgEyOgcykdsnBJY4ykx02XWkFVvugaXQ+dUmOW/fY1PJy/kmeBmi XzJSPiqrtWI0sZ7s0SnKnRSnM60t0FLRlEXFY1c6ElvEsX5M0R/+zTqGzUAVx/4Rx7Pp 7jiseyNbGSG+kGmfB+5aKDn5/ZdRcQCzIdrrJHKP0TCgWqU/fT7KkoGSXi73bmx8SIli VuNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XeJqlljc/DcLq2LdbRfl+U/1KHhpI1pBfv141U86JNE=; b=MClbN61NC5PkfOtmi/+mKYj2RUtHqfo5MSIjCjEZfXU1arlj4SZQN5J82PtUqD5AR0 UwceuNDkZRgvva+vaAkMNgmrLzZjGlR0sYCMYYZV7ha1SVNTbPHJhSlxngWY7TsWISXr Sp/sqVf1jnNmA4uQKK2pZ86MBV1r02915mfHqLlLfxAsilZz8gqusFH9KWyvQDHteKS3 1DQHVmgdafbug8wb4rUD8PpqOGlFDmgB7554L7mNbpBBuJixY4jruJW/0fFUd4ZbxzI1 DMfcCSj/9NiqqCOAQnAHmEDJsbwg05ZW3idXsqLEQSqkMRp+5YTu93JIglacDGGFtLgI u7tA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUDr3A8RRjUo7gWYsi7YEOqQ800B9WoSyF+Ayrw3A77mIgP+xHb 0+bgeHzOvyiAzwyZSpr5Tqk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdYUr51nh4UeWcmVb6oKc95oIfUDQiXlMIvmhxL2RNewwBvTldXS38KcN5oRHmID4SatYnKA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:fb01:: with SMTP id o1mr3659036pgh.410.1559924844088; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e26sm2796782pfn.94.2019.06.07.09.27.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:27:22 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/69] 4.14.124-stable review Message-ID: <20190607162722.GA21998@roeck-us.net> References: <20190607153848.271562617@linuxfoundation.org> <20190607161102.GA19615@roeck-us.net> <20190607161627.GA9920@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190607161627.GA9920@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 06:16:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:11:02AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.124 release. > > > There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun 09 Jun 2019 03:37:08 PM UTC. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'btrfs_add_link': > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6590:27: error: invalid initializer > > struct timespec64 now = current_time(&parent_inode->vfs_inode); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6592:35: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from type 'struct timespec64' > > parent_inode->vfs_inode.i_mtime = now; > > ^ > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6593:35: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from type 'struct timespec64' > > parent_inode->vfs_inode.i_ctime = now; > > ^ > > What arch? This builds for me here. odd... > arm, i386, m68k, mips, parisc, xtensa, ppc, sh4 It was originally seen with v4.14.123-69-gcc46c1204f89 last night, but I confirmed that v4.14.123-70-g94c5316fb246 is still affected. Guenter