From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:55:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611115529.6e3ae12d.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190606115127.55519-3-pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:51:21 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> To support protected virtualization cio will need to make sure the
> memory used for communication with the hypervisor is DMA memory.
>
> Let us introduce one global pool for cio.
>
> Our DMA pools are implemented as a gen_pool backed with DMA pages. The
> idea is to avoid each allocation effectively wasting a page, as we
> typically allocate much less than PAGE_SIZE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h | 11 +++
> drivers/s390/cio/css.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
(...)
> +void cio_gp_dma_destroy(struct gen_pool *gp_dma, struct device *dma_dev)
> +{
> + if (!gp_dma)
> + return;
> + /* this is qite ugly but no better idea */
typo: s/qite/quite/
> + gen_pool_for_each_chunk(gp_dma, __gp_dma_free_dma, dma_dev);
> + gen_pool_destroy(gp_dma);
> +}
(...)
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:55:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611115529.6e3ae12d.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190606115127.55519-3-pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:51:21 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> To support protected virtualization cio will need to make sure the
> memory used for communication with the hypervisor is DMA memory.
>
> Let us introduce one global pool for cio.
>
> Our DMA pools are implemented as a gen_pool backed with DMA pages. The
> idea is to avoid each allocation effectively wasting a page, as we
> typically allocate much less than PAGE_SIZE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h | 11 +++
> drivers/s390/cio/css.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
(...)
> +void cio_gp_dma_destroy(struct gen_pool *gp_dma, struct device *dma_dev)
> +{
> + if (!gp_dma)
> + return;
> + /* this is qite ugly but no better idea */
typo: s/qite/quite/
> + gen_pool_for_each_chunk(gp_dma, __gp_dma_free_dma, dma_dev);
> + gen_pool_destroy(gp_dma);
> +}
(...)
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-11 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-06 11:51 [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] s390/mm: force swiotlb for " Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-06-11 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 6:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 6:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] s390/airq: use DMA memory for adapter interrupts Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 10:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 10:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 14:27 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 14:27 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 16:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 16:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 0:32 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-12 0:32 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-12 6:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 6:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 13:33 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-12 13:33 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-12 13:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 13:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] virtio/s390: use cacheline aligned airq bit vectors Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] virtio/s390: add indirection to indicators access Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] virtio/s390: use DMA memory for ccw I/O and classic notifiers Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 10:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 10:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] virtio/s390: make airq summary indicators DMA Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 10:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 10:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 10:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-06-11 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190611115529.6e3ae12d.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.