From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"open list:NETWORKING \[GENERAL\]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] swiotlb: Cleanup and consistency fix
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:48:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611184834.GD12859@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611175825.572-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:58:23AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
I pulled the patches in my tree.
>
> Still with my contrived memory layout where there is no physical memory
> the kernel can use below 4GB, it was possible to fail swiotlb_init(),
> but still not hit swiotlb_map_single() since all peripherals have a
> DMA_BIT_MASK() that is within the remaining addressable physical memory.
>
> The second path could be backported to stable, but for the same reasons
> as the one we had just discussed before, this requires a very contrived
> test case that is not necessarily realistic or would warrant a stable
> backport IMHO.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Florian Fainelli (2):
> swiotlb: Group identical cleanup in swiotlb_cleanup()
> swiotlb: Return consistent SWIOTLB segments/nr_tbl
>
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] swiotlb: Cleanup and consistency fix
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:48:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611184834.GD12859@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611175825.572-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:58:23AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
I pulled the patches in my tree.
>
> Still with my contrived memory layout where there is no physical memory
> the kernel can use below 4GB, it was possible to fail swiotlb_init(),
> but still not hit swiotlb_map_single() since all peripherals have a
> DMA_BIT_MASK() that is within the remaining addressable physical memory.
>
> The second path could be backported to stable, but for the same reasons
> as the one we had just discussed before, this requires a very contrived
> test case that is not necessarily realistic or would warrant a stable
> backport IMHO.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Florian Fainelli (2):
> swiotlb: Group identical cleanup in swiotlb_cleanup()
> swiotlb: Return consistent SWIOTLB segments/nr_tbl
>
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-11 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 17:58 [PATCH 0/2] swiotlb: Cleanup and consistency fix Florian Fainelli
2019-06-11 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-06-11 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] swiotlb: Group identical cleanup in swiotlb_cleanup() Florian Fainelli
2019-06-11 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-06-14 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] swiotlb: Return consistent SWIOTLB segments/nr_tbl Florian Fainelli
2019-06-11 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-06-14 9:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14 9:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 18:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2019-06-11 18:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] swiotlb: Cleanup and consistency fix Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190611184834.GD12859@char.us.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.