Re: [PATCH 1/1] util-linux: upgrade to 2.33.2

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:06:33AM +0800, Chen Qi wrote:
> The license files' names are changed, but the contents remain the
> same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc              | 16 ++++++++--------
>  .../{util-linux_2.32.1.bb => util-linux_2.33.2.bb}       |  4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>  rename meta/recipes-core/util-linux/{util-linux_2.32.1.bb => util-linux_2.33.2.bb} (72%)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc
> index 7b9b4d2..eaaf408 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc
> @@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ SECTION = "base"
>  
>  LICENSE = "GPLv2+ & LGPLv2.1+ & BSD"
>...
> -                    file://Documentation/licenses/COPYING.UCB;md5=263860f8968d8bafa5392cab74285262 \
>...
> +                    file://Documentation/licenses/COPYING.BSD-4-Clause-UC;md5=263860f8968d8bafa5392cab74285262 \
>...

Doesn't this mean that LICENSE is (and already was before) wrong?

meta/files/common-licenses/BSD is the 3 clause BSD licence,
but this is the 4 clause licence (with the advertising clause).

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed