From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/static_key: always define static_branch_deferred_inc
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:59:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190612125911.509d79f2@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612194409.197461-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:44:09 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> This interface is currently only defined if CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL. Make it
> available also when jump labels are disabled.
>
> Fixes: ad282a8117d50 ("locking/static_key: Add support for deferred static branches")
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> ---
>
> The original patch went into 5.2-rc1, but this interface is not yet
> used, so this could target either 5.2 or 5.3.
Can we drop the Fixes tag? It's an ugly omission but not a bug fix.
Are you planning to switch clean_acked_data_enable() to the helper once
merged?
Thanks!
> diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> index 42710d5949ba..8c3ee291b2d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ extern void jump_label_update_timeout(struct work_struct *work);
> 0), \
> }
>
> -#define static_branch_deferred_inc(x) static_branch_inc(&(x)->key)
> -
> #else /* !CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */
> struct static_key_deferred {
> struct static_key key;
> @@ -95,4 +93,7 @@ jump_label_rate_limit(struct static_key_deferred *key,
> STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */
> +
> +#define static_branch_deferred_inc(x) static_branch_inc(&(x)->key)
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_JUMP_LABEL_RATELIMIT_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 19:44 [PATCH] locking/static_key: always define static_branch_deferred_inc Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-12 19:59 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-06-12 20:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-12 20:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-13 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-13 15:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190612125911.509d79f2@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.