From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id D2332E00DF0; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 01:29:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [141.84.69.5 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from mail.stusta.mhn.de (mail.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F84E00D8F for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 01:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.stusta.mhn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45PcNb1gFfz3J; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:29:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stusta.de; s=default; t=1560414576; bh=ZBpA+VA8XFf2KaId+pFc2BkCEFtvElOuiMUxyQ6uPHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kBsCIpDXm8s+NDB3x2hj9V4hSlhDv46YCCC8SfChzsdbA8sbRm+DnQtOJ0i2CxNTB PXrHhyjmR/tAfOxRHkuuf3INFsL4vD6nM3yYAZJBYTDAglxH0jFb+MQ0XwZvLD8NWa RLHi7+kNNYX+ZwLRI5y/mOjd4aaB2gXDHVuWACw+IvpVngcyYArxshWpT/IKvM0wly cS3ZXJDsXaL5d6F9zAmszhmA3hYWfgbCq7v2IKpvKIbxH36+KrmkyYZnM2PlBXby0J tu8gj3kGAwoQRoMl0wpdU5wI4WP4sbh5bXts836M7NShXvaHNW2m4Fcl6miGCVgopW ufxxoZPJyvDdsXM0Uk9and9mmswlnMxEaOINtjCRyKwqNMu615L6MVIdi7hbwRLfXW pQKMwntgjlc5PGcnLXUP6KKzGvcvRXPZBRFpIIPa5i0h9ke3T70W1PmDvve7MwO0Mt Hz0kIHGOQyiQXxlK195cP37uC6lAcHseAC5pZyBDrtiorDkQHbe/uzK7vy0EqY8YPA HLo2HRS/1qIWC5leiA7Esmu2SoO36fzxYzsR+JamUdup64436sKut5jypL8Mo1dOCo 4637JTUeePCf0T3QSb174fyq3504i/9Om1HwWWTXyiOegB9OeNT4xTtBpA2ZpsrALx 4nVbMT3GFXHhjYQWHtKWuFWs= Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:29:31 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: changqing.li@windriver.com Message-ID: <20190613082931.GA15674@localhost> References: <1560411964-388665-1-git-send-email-changqing.li@windriver.com> <1560411964-388665-2-git-send-email-changqing.li@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1560411964-388665-2-git-send-email-changqing.li@windriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [patchtest][PATCH 2/2] patchtest: fix linux-yocto version X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:29:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:46:04PM +0800, changqing.li@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > 4.9 is not avaiable currently, preferred version changed > to 5.0, also correct the bbappend name 5.0 is already EOL upstream and will be removed soon. >... > --- a/scripts/create-guest-machine > +++ b/scripts/create-guest-machine > @@ -145,10 +145,7 @@ cat >> $POKY/build/conf/auto.conf << EOF > $PTSMARK > MACHINE = "$MACHINE" > > -# The preferred kernel version in poky (4.10%, master) returns an error whilst > -# executing patchtest on guest. Changing the preferred version to 4.9% as it > -# is more suitable and does not present any errors. > -PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto_qemux86-64 = "4.9%" > +PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto_qemux86-64 = "5.0%" >... This looks as if it was a temporary workaround for some problem with kernel 4.10. If 5.0 works, then there is not really a reason for changing the preferred version here. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed