From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:05:35 -0700 From: Sean Christopherson Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets Message-ID: <20190613200535.GC18385@linux.intel.com> References: <20190612170834.14855-1-mhillenb@amazon.de> <459e2273-bc27-f422-601b-2d6cdaf06f84@amazon.com> <70BEF143-00BA-4E4B-ACD7-41AD2E6250BE@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: To: Dave Hansen Cc: Nadav Amit , Andy Lutomirski , Alexander Graf , Marius Hillenbrand , kvm list , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux-MM , Alexander Graf , David Woodhouse , the arch/x86 maintainers , Peter Zijlstra List-ID: On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:49:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 6/13/19 10:29 AM, Nadav Amit wrote: > > Having said that, I am not too excited to deal with this issue. Do > > people still care about x86/32-bit? > No, not really. Especially not for KVM, given the number of times 32-bit KVM has been broken recently without anyone noticing for several kernel releases.