From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: bcm2835: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:05:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614050547.GA8952@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0e6c04d-143f-1b42-0536-028adc9a55a5@linaro.org>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 13/06/2019 20:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
>
> Sorry if I'm missing some context but does it mean we do no longer take
> care of roll-backing anything?
Yes, but how can that happen here?
> It is acceptable to have half of the debugfs set for example?
Yes, your code should never care about this.
> Or a parent failing to create and the children polluting the root
> debugfs dir because the parent is NULL?
How can the parent be NULL? Remember, debugfs_create_dir() can never
return NULL, so that should not happen. And even if it does, that's
fine, who cares :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 18:37 [PATCH] thermal: bcm2835: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-13 20:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-14 5:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-06-14 6:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190614050547.GA8952@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.