All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: vfio-ccw code rework
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:32:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617153228.0c5dca9f.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190606202831.44135-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu,  6 Jun 2019 22:28:22 +0200
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Now that we've gotten a lot of other series either merged or
> pending for the next merge window, I'd like to revisit some
> code simplification that I started many moons ago.
> 
> In that first series, a couple of fixes got merged into 4.20,
> a couple more got some "seems okay" acks/reviews, and the rest
> were nearly forgotten about.  I dusted them off and did quite a
> bit of rework to make things a little more sequential and
> providing a better narrative (I think) based on the lessons we
> learned in my earlier changes.  Because of this rework, the
> acks/reviews on the first version didn't really translate to the
> code that exists here (patch 1 being the closest exception), so
> I didn't apply any of them here.  The end result is mostly the
> same as before, but now looks like this:
> 
> Patch summary:
> 1:   Squash duplicate code
> 2-4: Remove duplicate code in CCW processor
> 5-7: Remove one layer of nested arrays
> 8-9: Combine direct/indirect addressing CCW processors
> 
> Using 5.2.0-rc3 as a base plus the vfio-ccw branch of recent fixes,
> we shrink the code quite a bit (8.7% according to the bloat-o-meter),
> and we remove one set of mallocs/frees on the I/O path by removing
> one layer of the nested arrays.  There are no functional/behavioral
> changes with this series; all the tests that I would run previously
> continue to pass/fail as they today.
> 
> Changelog:
>  v1/RFC->v2:
>   - [Eric] Dropped first two patches, as they have been merged
>   - [Eric] Shuffling of patches for readability/understandability
>   - [Halil] Actually added meaningful comments/commit messages
>     in the patches
>  v1/RFC: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10675251/
> 
> Eric Farman (9):
>   s390/cio: Squash cp_free() and cp_unpin_free()
>   s390/cio: Refactor the routine that handles TIC CCWs
>   s390/cio: Generalize the TIC handler
>   s390/cio: Use generalized CCW handler in cp_init()
>   vfio-ccw: Rearrange pfn_array and pfn_array_table arrays
>   vfio-ccw: Adjust the first IDAW outside of the nested loops
>   vfio-ccw: Remove pfn_array_table
>   vfio-ccw: Rearrange IDAL allocation in direct CCW
>   s390/cio: Combine direct and indirect CCW paths
> 
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 313 +++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks, applied.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-17 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-06 20:28 [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: vfio-ccw code rework Eric Farman
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] s390/cio: Squash cp_free() and cp_unpin_free() Eric Farman
2019-06-12 11:07   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] s390/cio: Refactor the routine that handles TIC CCWs Eric Farman
2019-06-12 11:17   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] s390/cio: Generalize the TIC handler Eric Farman
2019-06-12 11:18   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] s390/cio: Use generalized CCW handler in cp_init() Eric Farman
2019-06-12 11:18   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] vfio-ccw: Rearrange pfn_array and pfn_array_table arrays Eric Farman
2019-06-13 16:02   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] vfio-ccw: Adjust the first IDAW outside of the nested loops Eric Farman
2019-06-13 16:02   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] vfio-ccw: Remove pfn_array_table Eric Farman
2019-06-13 16:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] vfio-ccw: Rearrange IDAL allocation in direct CCW Eric Farman
2019-06-14  9:42   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] s390/cio: Combine direct and indirect CCW paths Eric Farman
2019-06-14 10:01   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-14 10:30     ` Eric Farman
2019-06-14 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] s390: vfio-ccw code rework Cornelia Huck
2019-06-17 13:32 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190617153228.0c5dca9f.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.