Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:361! on AMD CPU

[Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:01:06PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> I am not a KVM folk either, but FWIW syzkaller is capable of creating
> a double-nested VM.

Aaaha, there it is. :)

> The code is somewhat VMX-specific, but it should
> be capable at least executing some SVM instructions inside of guest.
> This code setups VM to run a given instruction sequences (should be generic):
> https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/34bf9440bd06034f86b5d9ac8afbf078129cbdae/executor/common_kvm_amd64.h
> The instruction generator is based on Intel XED so it may be somewhat
> Intel-biased, but at least I see some mentions of SVM there:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/syzkaller/34bf9440bd06034f86b5d9ac8afbf078129cbdae/pkg/ifuzz/gen/all-enc-instructions.txt

Right, and that right there looks wrong:

ICLASS    : VMLOAD
CPL       : 3
CATEGORY  : SYSTEM
EXTENSION : SVM
ATTRIBUTES: PROTECTED_MODE
PATTERN   : 0x0F 0x01 MOD[0b11] MOD=3 REG[0b011] RM[0b010]
OPERANDS  : REG0=OrAX():r:IMPL

That is, *if* "CPL: 3" above means in XED context that VMLOAD is
supposed to be run in CPL3, then this is wrong because VMLOAD #GPs if
CPL was not 0. Ditto for VMRUN and a couple of others.

Perhaps that support was added at some point but not really run on AMD
hw yet...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.