All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: process empty directory if large_dir and inline_data set
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:00:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190619190029.GA3383@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190614144237.6010-1-c17828@cray.com>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:42:37PM +0300, Artem Blagodarenko wrote:
> Doing a forced check on an ext4 file system with inline_data and
> large_dir results in lots of fsck messages. To reproduce:
> ...
> 
> Rootcause of this issue is large_dir optimization that is not
> appropriate for inline_data.
> 
> Let's not optimize it if inline_data is set.
> 
> Reported-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Blagodarenko <c17828@cray.com>

Thanks, applied, although I corrected the commit description.  The
initial description now reads:

    e2fsck: correctly handle inline directories when large_dir is enabled.
    
    Historically, e2fsck has required that directories not contain holes.
    (In fact, as of this writing, ext4 still requires this to be the
    case.)  Commit ae9efd05a98 ("e2fsck: 3 level hash tree directory
    optimization") removed this requirement if the large_dir feature is
    enabled; however, the way it was done caused it to incorrectly handle
    inline directories.

    To reproduce the problem fixed by this commit:
    ...

BTW, Removing the directory hole check in commit ae9efd05a98 for file
systems with the large_dir feature enabled was a wee bit optimistic,
since the kernel will still mark the file system as corrupted.

Fixing the kernel so that it doesn't complain about directories with
holes is going to be a bit more complicated than just removing the
check in __ext4_read_dirblock():

	if (!bh) {
		ext4_error_inode(inode, func, line, block,
				 "Directory hole found");
		return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
	}

(That's because we have to fix all of the callers of
ext4_read_dirblock() to handle the case where it returns NULL if there
is no directory block at that specified location.)

I should have caught that when reviewing the e2fsprogs commit; my bad.
At this point, we should just fix the kernel so it can handle
directories with holes (both for large_dir and non-large_dir
directories).

      		      	      		- Ted

      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-19 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14 14:42 [PATCH] e2fsck: process empty directory if large_dir and inline_data set Artem Blagodarenko
2019-06-19 19:00 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190619190029.GA3383@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=artem.blagodarenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.