All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-x86 <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, "Liang,
	Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/rapl: restart perf rapl counter after resume
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:50:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620125059.GZ3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560778897.10723.6.camel@intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 09:41:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:

> After S3 suspend/resume, "perf stat -I 1000 -e power/energy-pkg/ -a"
> reports an insane value for the very first sampling period after resume
> as shown below.
> 
>     19.278989977               2.16 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     20.279373569               1.96 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     21.279765481               2.09 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     22.280305420               2.10 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     25.504782277   4,294,966,686.01 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     26.505114993               3.58 Joules power/energy-pkg/
>     27.505471758               1.66 Joules power/energy-pkg/
> 
> Fix this by resetting the counter right after resume.

Cute...


> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +
> +static int perf_rapl_suspend(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	get_online_cpus();
> +	for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
> +		rapl_pmu_update_all(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
> +	put_online_cpus();
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_rapl_resume(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	get_online_cpus();
> +	for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->maxpkg; i++)
> +		rapl_pmu_restart_all(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
> +	put_online_cpus();
> +}

What's the reason for that get/put_online_cpus() here ?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 13:41 [PATCH] perf/rapl: restart perf rapl counter after resume Zhang Rui
2019-06-20 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-06-20 14:33   ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190620125059.GZ3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.