From: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH] download/git: ban branch references
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:36:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190621131846.0f8f74e4@donbot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+1k=2Zy3fgq+QQ9r7YYvz6+p7QFxSnmeCVEB+_yDmweziAA-Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:27:02 -0600
Joel Carlson <JoelsonCarl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:19 AM John Keeping <john@metanate.com> wrote:
> >
> > As described in the manual, using a branch name as a version is not
> > supported. However, nothing enforces this so it is easy to specify a
> > branch name either accidentally or because new developers have not read
> > through the manual.
>
> At a more general discussion level, I have to admit I like having the
> ability to use a branch name even if it isn't supported. During
> development I find it easier to use a branch name and just delete the
> cached version to force it to re-download when I know I have new
> updates. I can switch to a tag when I have a version I actually want
> tagged and "final." Otherwise I'd have to keep tagging changes and
> updating what tag to grab in the config or package file to pull in new
> changes.
>
> Granted, it isn't a huge inconvenience to switch how I do things, and
> I could see it being useful to "idiot-proof" for people who don't
> realize the potential problems with using branch names. But I at
> least wanted to make my opinion known that I like it the way it is.
I'm curious what advantages you see to this method compared to
_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR. I find pointing to an external version of the source
to be more flexible and generally faster than pulling from Git every
time.
Regards,
John
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-21 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-19 15:18 [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH] download/git: ban branch references John Keeping
2019-06-19 15:34 ` John Keeping
2019-06-20 16:39 ` Yann E. MORIN
2019-06-21 16:36 ` John Keeping
2019-06-22 7:47 ` Yann E. MORIN
2019-06-24 11:30 ` John Keeping
2019-06-24 11:32 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/2] download/git: fetch all refs from the remote John Keeping
2019-06-24 11:32 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] download/git: ban branch references John Keeping
2019-12-29 22:12 ` Yann E. MORIN
2020-01-02 17:57 ` John Keeping
2019-12-29 22:03 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/2] download/git: fetch all refs from the remote Yann E. MORIN
2019-06-20 17:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH] download/git: ban branch references Joel Carlson
2019-06-21 12:36 ` John Keeping [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190621131846.0f8f74e4@donbot \
--to=john@metanate.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.