From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/5] livepatch: Allow to distinguish different version of system state changes
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:00:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190621142156.GF20356@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190621140911.GC20356@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:09:11AM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> More word play: would it be any clearer to drop the use of
> "modification" when talking about klp_states? Sometimes I read
> modification to mean a change to a klp_state itself rather than the
> system at large.
After reading through the rest of the series, maybe I was premature
about this. "System state modification" is used consistently throughout
the series, so without having any better suggestion, ignore my comment.
-- Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-21 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 13:56 [RFC 0/5] livepatch: new API to track system state changes Petr Mladek
2019-06-11 13:56 ` [RFC 1/5] livepatch: Keep replaced patches until post_patch callback is called Petr Mladek
2019-06-11 13:56 ` [RFC 2/5] livepatch: Basic API to track system state changes Petr Mladek
2019-06-21 13:43 ` Joe Lawrence
2019-06-24 9:32 ` Nicolai Stange
2019-06-11 13:56 ` [RFC 3/5] livepatch: Allow to distinguish different version of " Petr Mladek
2019-06-21 11:27 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-06-21 14:09 ` Joe Lawrence
2019-06-21 15:00 ` Joe Lawrence [this message]
2019-06-24 10:26 ` Nicolai Stange
2019-07-18 11:38 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-18 9:08 ` Petr Mladek
2019-06-11 13:56 ` [RFC 4/5] livepatch: Documentation of the new API for tracking " Petr Mladek
2019-06-21 14:15 ` Joe Lawrence
2019-06-11 13:56 ` [RFC 5/5] livepatch: Selftests of the " Petr Mladek
2019-06-21 11:54 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-06-21 14:19 ` Joe Lawrence
2019-06-15 20:47 ` [RFC 0/5] livepatch: new API to track " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-21 13:19 ` Joe Lawrence
2019-06-24 9:27 ` Nicolai Stange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190621142156.GF20356@redhat.com \
--to=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.