From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: simplify xfs_chain_bio
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:17:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624161750.GR5387@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624134315.21307-2-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 03:43:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Move setting up operation and write hint to xfs_alloc_ioend, and
> then just copy over all needed information from the previous bio
> in xfs_chain_bio and stop passing various parameters to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Uh, is this the same patch with the same name in the previous series?
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index a6f0f4761a37..9cceb90e77c5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -665,7 +665,6 @@ xfs_submit_ioend(
>
> ioend->io_bio->bi_private = ioend;
> ioend->io_bio->bi_end_io = xfs_end_bio;
> - ioend->io_bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE | wbc_to_write_flags(wbc);
>
> /*
> * If we are failing the IO now, just mark the ioend with an
> @@ -679,7 +678,6 @@ xfs_submit_ioend(
> return status;
> }
>
> - ioend->io_bio->bi_write_hint = ioend->io_inode->i_write_hint;
> submit_bio(ioend->io_bio);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -691,7 +689,8 @@ xfs_alloc_ioend(
> xfs_exntst_t state,
> xfs_off_t offset,
> struct block_device *bdev,
> - sector_t sector)
> + sector_t sector,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc)
> {
> struct xfs_ioend *ioend;
> struct bio *bio;
> @@ -699,6 +698,8 @@ xfs_alloc_ioend(
> bio = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOFS, BIO_MAX_PAGES, &xfs_ioend_bioset);
> bio_set_dev(bio, bdev);
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
> + bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE | wbc_to_write_flags(wbc);
> + bio->bi_write_hint = inode->i_write_hint;
>
> ioend = container_of(bio, struct xfs_ioend, io_inline_bio);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ioend->io_list);
> @@ -719,24 +720,22 @@ xfs_alloc_ioend(
> * so that the bi_private linkage is set up in the right direction for the
> * traversal in xfs_destroy_ioend().
> */
> -static void
> +static struct bio *
> xfs_chain_bio(
> - struct xfs_ioend *ioend,
> - struct writeback_control *wbc,
> - struct block_device *bdev,
> - sector_t sector)
> + struct bio *prev)
> {
> struct bio *new;
>
> new = bio_alloc(GFP_NOFS, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
> - bio_set_dev(new, bdev);
> - new->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
> - bio_chain(ioend->io_bio, new);
> - bio_get(ioend->io_bio); /* for xfs_destroy_ioend */
> - ioend->io_bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE | wbc_to_write_flags(wbc);
> - ioend->io_bio->bi_write_hint = ioend->io_inode->i_write_hint;
> - submit_bio(ioend->io_bio);
> - ioend->io_bio = new;
> + bio_copy_dev(new, prev);
> + new->bi_iter.bi_sector = bio_end_sector(prev);
> + new->bi_opf = prev->bi_opf;
> + new->bi_write_hint = prev->bi_write_hint;
> +
> + bio_chain(prev, new);
> + bio_get(prev); /* for xfs_destroy_ioend */
> + submit_bio(prev);
> + return new;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -771,14 +770,14 @@ xfs_add_to_ioend(
> if (wpc->ioend)
> list_add(&wpc->ioend->io_list, iolist);
> wpc->ioend = xfs_alloc_ioend(inode, wpc->fork,
> - wpc->imap.br_state, offset, bdev, sector);
> + wpc->imap.br_state, offset, bdev, sector, wbc);
> }
>
> if (!__bio_try_merge_page(wpc->ioend->io_bio, page, len, poff, true)) {
> if (iop)
> atomic_inc(&iop->write_count);
> if (bio_full(wpc->ioend->io_bio))
> - xfs_chain_bio(wpc->ioend, wbc, bdev, sector);
> + wpc->ioend->io_bio = xfs_chain_bio(wpc->ioend->io_bio);
> bio_add_page(wpc->ioend->io_bio, page, len, poff);
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-24 13:43 xfs cgroup writeback support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: simplify xfs_chain_bio Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-06-25 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: implement cgroup aware writeback Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-25 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 10:06 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-06-25 3:25 ` xfs cgroup writeback support Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-25 10:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 5:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 15:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190624161750.GR5387@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.