All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: iio-utils: Fix possible incorrect mask calculation
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:38:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626203824.2abe12d8@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4b10f0d0d765c1ae972cdf896ddc490fe898c8a.camel@hadess.net>

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:34:47 +0200
Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> wrote:

> On some machines, iio-sensor-proxy was returning all 0's for IIO sensor
> values. It turns out that the bits_used for this sensor is 32, which makes
> the mask calculation:
> 
> *mask = (1 << 32) - 1;
> 
> If the compiler interprets the 1 literals as 32-bit ints, it generates
> undefined behavior depending on compiler version and optimization level.
> On my system, it optimizes out the shift, so the mask value becomes
> 
> *mask = (1) - 1;
> 
> With a mask value of 0, iio-sensor-proxy will always return 0 for every axis.
> 
> Avoid incorrect 0 values caused by compiler optimization.
> 
> See original fix by Brett Dutro <brett.dutro@gmail.com> in
> iio-sensor-proxy:
> https://github.com/hadess/iio-sensor-proxy/commit/9615ceac7c134d838660e209726cd86aa2064fd3

Needs a Signed-off-by:

Otherwise good fix!

Jonathan

> ---
>  tools/iio/iio_utils.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/iio/iio_utils.c b/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> index a22b6e8fad46..7399eb7f1378 100644
> --- a/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> +++ b/tools/iio/iio_utils.c
> @@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ int iioutils_get_type(unsigned *is_signed, unsigned *bytes, unsigned *bits_used,
>  			*be = (endianchar == 'b');
>  			*bytes = padint / 8;
>  			if (*bits_used == 64)
> -				*mask = ~0;
> +				*mask = ~(0ULL);
>  			else
> -				*mask = (1ULL << *bits_used) - 1;
> +				*mask = (1ULL << *bits_used) - 1ULL;
>  
>  			*is_signed = (signchar == 's');
>  			if (fclose(sysfsfp)) {
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-26 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-24 11:34 [PATCH] iio: iio-utils: Fix possible incorrect mask calculation Bastien Nocera
2019-06-26 19:38 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190626203824.2abe12d8@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=hadess@hadess.net \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.