From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] virtio-scsi: restart DMA after iothread
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:03:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627110344.GD5618@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620173709.14753-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Am 20.06.2019 um 19:37 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> v5:
> * Plumbing vm change state handlers into DeviceClass/BusClass is a rather
> large bug fix. Instead I've combined the previous priorities approach with
> the observation from Kevin and Paolo that we really want to order by qdev
> tree depth.
>
> The new qdev_add_vm_change_state_handler() API lets DeviceStates register
> callbacks that execute in qdev tree depth order. This solves the
> virtio-scsi bug since the virtio-scsi device's callback must complete before
> its child scsi-disk's callback runs.
>
> Is this a good compromise for everyone?
I'd still call it a hack, but I can also see that doing the real thing
would be a lot of work that might not be worth the effort.
Thanks, applied to the block branch.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-20 17:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] virtio-scsi: restart DMA after iothread Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-06-20 17:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/3] vl: add qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler_prio() Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-06-20 17:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/3] qdev: add qdev_add_vm_change_state_handler() Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-06-20 17:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/3] virtio-scsi: restart DMA after iothread Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-06-20 18:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] " Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-27 11:03 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-20 17:35 Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190627110344.GD5618@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.