From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] nvmet: Export NVMe namespace attributes
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:02:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190628070243.GB28268@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190627143215.27443-3-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019@07:32:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> +/* Convert a 32-bit number to a 16-bit 0's based number */
> +static __le16 to0based(u32 a)
> +{
> + return cpu_to_le16(max(1U, min(1U << 16, a)) - 1);
> +}
Maybe lift this to drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h as an inline as it
might be generally useful for more thing in the future?
> + /*
> + * For NVMe 1.4 and later, bit 4 indicates that the fields NPWG,
I'd drop the NVMe 1.4 as it is a bit pointless. Also in NVMe you
can generally implement the TPs on older compliance levels (which is in
fact what we do here anyway).
> +void nvmet_file_set_limits(struct file *file, struct nvme_id_ns *id)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Since the file backend uses buffered I/O and since the NVMe spec
> + * does not allow to report that atomic commands are not supported by
> + * a namespace, do not set any of the namespace specific atomic
> + * properties. This will cause the initiator to rely on the atomic
> + * properties reported by the controller. To do: discuss whether or
> + * not the file backend should use direct I/O instead of buffered I/O.
> + */
> +}
This function doesn't seem overly helpful to me. Can we just skip
that whole function and the comment?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-28 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-27 14:32 [PATCH v4 0/3] NVMe 1.4 Identify Namespace Support Bart Van Assche
2019-06-27 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] nvme: Introduce NVMe 1.4 Identify Namespace fields in struct nvme_id_ns Bart Van Assche
2019-06-28 7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] nvmet: Export NVMe namespace attributes Bart Van Assche
2019-06-27 17:11 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-06-28 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-06-27 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] nvme: Set physical block size and optimal I/O size according to NVMe 1.4 Bart Van Assche
2019-06-28 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190628070243.GB28268@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.