Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/8] numa: move numa global variable numa_info into MachineState

[Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:56:22 +0800
Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com> wrote:

> Move existing numa global numa_info (renamed as "nodes") into NumaState.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Liu Jingqi <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v5 -> v4:
>     - Directly use ms->numa_state->nodes and not dereferencing
>     ms->numa_state in the first place when ms->numa_state is possible
>     NULL (Igor)

the sa,e like in previous patch,
use ms->numa_state->nodes directly whenever possible without using
intermediate local variable

> ---
>  exec.c                   |  2 +-
>  hw/acpi/aml-build.c      |  6 ++++--
>  hw/arm/boot.c            |  2 +-
>  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c |  7 ++++---
>  hw/arm/virt.c            |  1 +
>  hw/i386/pc.c             |  4 ++--
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c           |  4 +++-
>  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c       |  1 +
>  include/sysemu/numa.h    |  3 +++
>  numa.c                   | 15 +++++++++------
>  10 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index c7eb4af42d..0e30926588 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@ long qemu_minrampagesize(void)
>      if (hpsize > mainrampagesize &&
>          (ms->numa_state == NULL ||
>           ms->numa_state->num_nodes == 0 ||
> -         numa_info[0].node_memdev == NULL)) {
> +         ms->numa_state->nodes[0].node_memdev == NULL)) {
>          static bool warned;
>          if (!warned) {
>              error_report("Huge page support disabled (n/a for main memory).");
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> index 63c1cae8c9..26ccc1a3e2 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> @@ -1737,8 +1737,10 @@ void build_slit(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, MachineState *ms)
>      build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, nb_numa_nodes, 8);
>      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
>          for (j = 0; j < nb_numa_nodes; j++) {
> -            assert(numa_info[i].distance[j]);
> -            build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, numa_info[i].distance[j], 1);
> +            assert(ms->numa_state->nodes[i].distance[j]);
> +            build_append_int_noprefix(table_data,
> +                                      ms->numa_state->nodes[i].distance[j],
> +                                      1);
>          }
>      }
>  
> diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
> index 2af881e0f4..0c1572d118 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/boot.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ int arm_load_dtb(hwaddr addr, const struct arm_boot_info *binfo,
>      if (ms->numa_state != NULL && ms->numa_state->num_nodes > 0) {
>          mem_base = binfo->loader_start;
>          for (i = 0; i < ms->numa_state->num_nodes; i++) {
> -            mem_len = numa_info[i].node_mem;
> +            mem_len = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
>              rc = fdt_add_memory_node(fdt, acells, mem_base,
>                                       scells, mem_len, i);
>              if (rc < 0) {
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index 9d2edd8023..422bbed2d3 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -536,11 +536,12 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, VirtMachineState *vms)
>  
>      mem_base = vms->memmap[VIRT_MEM].base;
>      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; ++i) {
> -        if (numa_info[i].node_mem > 0) {
> +        if (ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem > 0) {
>              numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof(*numamem));
> -            build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, numa_info[i].node_mem, i,
> +            build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base,
> +                              ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem, i,
>                                MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
> -            mem_base += numa_info[i].node_mem;
> +            mem_base += ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
>          }
>      }
>  
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index d147cceab6..d3904d74dc 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ static void create_fdt(VirtMachineState *vms)
>          int size = nb_numa_nodes * nb_numa_nodes * 3 * sizeof(uint32_t);
>          uint32_t *matrix = g_malloc0(size);
>          int idx, i, j;
> +        NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
>
>          for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
>              for (j = 0; j < nb_numa_nodes; j++) {
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 5bab78e137..4cc84c5050 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ static FWCfgState *bochs_bios_init(AddressSpace *as, PCMachineState *pcms)
>      }
>      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
>          numa_fw_cfg[pcms->apic_id_limit + 1 + i] =
> -            cpu_to_le64(numa_info[i].node_mem);
> +            cpu_to_le64(ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem);
>      }
>      fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NUMA, numa_fw_cfg,
>                       (1 + pcms->apic_id_limit + nb_numa_nodes) *
> @@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ void pc_guest_info_init(PCMachineState *pcms)
>      pcms->node_mem = g_malloc0(pcms->numa_nodes *
>                                      sizeof *pcms->node_mem);
>      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
> -        pcms->node_mem[i] = numa_info[i].node_mem;
> +        pcms->node_mem[i] = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
>      }
>  
>      pcms->machine_done.notify = pc_machine_done;
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 07a02db99e..3f2e6e0f5f 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ static hwaddr spapr_node0_size(MachineState *machine)
>      int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
>      if (nb_numa_nodes) {
>          int i;
> +        NodeInfo *numa_info = machine->numa_state->nodes;
>          for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; ++i) {
>              if (numa_info[i].node_mem) {
>                  return MIN(pow2floor(numa_info[i].node_mem),
> @@ -395,7 +396,7 @@ static int spapr_populate_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt)
>      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
>      hwaddr mem_start, node_size;
>      int i;
> -    NodeInfo *nodes = numa_info;
> +    NodeInfo *nodes = machine->numa_state->nodes;
>      NodeInfo ramnode;
>  
>      /* No NUMA nodes, assume there is just one node with whole RAM */
> @@ -2521,6 +2522,7 @@ static void spapr_validate_node_memory(MachineState *machine, Error **errp)
>  {
>      int i;
>      int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
> +    NodeInfo *numa_info = machine->numa_state->nodes;
>  
>      if (machine->ram_size % SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE) {
>          error_setg(errp, "Memory size 0x" RAM_ADDR_FMT
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> index d6fd018dd4..9d4ebd60de 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> @@ -1639,6 +1639,7 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      SpaprPhbState *sphb = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(s);
>      PCIHostState *phb = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(s);
>      MachineState *ms = MACHINE(spapr);
> +    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
>      char *namebuf;
>      int i;
>      PCIBus *bus;
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/numa.h b/include/sysemu/numa.h
> index 08a86080c4..437eb21fef 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/numa.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/numa.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ struct NumaState {
>  
>      /* Allow setting NUMA distance for different NUMA nodes */
>      bool have_numa_distance;
> +
> +    /* NUMA nodes information */
> +    NodeInfo nodes[MAX_NODES];
>  };
>  typedef struct NumaState NumaState;

Shouldn't you remove global numa_info var from header as well? 

> diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
> index 9432d42ad0..d23e130bce 100644
> --- a/numa.c
> +++ b/numa.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,6 @@ static int have_memdevs = -1;
>  static int max_numa_nodeid; /* Highest specified NUMA node ID, plus one.
>                               * For all nodes, nodeid < max_numa_nodeid
>                               */
> -bool have_numa_distance;
> -NodeInfo numa_info[MAX_NODES];
> -
>  
>  static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
>                              Error **errp)
> @@ -63,6 +60,7 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
>      uint16_t nodenr;
>      uint16List *cpus = NULL;
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> +    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
>  
>      if (node->has_nodeid) {
>          nodenr = node->nodeid;
> @@ -144,6 +142,7 @@ void parse_numa_distance(MachineState *ms, NumaDistOptions *dist, Error **errp)
>      uint16_t src = dist->src;
>      uint16_t dst = dist->dst;
>      uint8_t val = dist->val;
> +    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
>  
>      if (src >= MAX_NODES || dst >= MAX_NODES) {
>          error_setg(errp, "Parameter '%s' expects an integer between 0 and %d",
> @@ -203,7 +202,7 @@ void set_numa_options(MachineState *ms, NumaOptions *object, Error **errp)
>              error_setg(&err, "Missing mandatory node-id property");
>              goto end;
>          }
> -        if (!numa_info[object->u.cpu.node_id].present) {
> +        if (!ms->numa_state->nodes[object->u.cpu.node_id].present) {
>              error_setg(&err, "Invalid node-id=%" PRId64 ", NUMA node must be "
>                  "defined with -numa node,nodeid=ID before it's used with "
>                  "-numa cpu,node-id=ID", object->u.cpu.node_id);
> @@ -263,6 +262,7 @@ static void validate_numa_distance(MachineState *ms)
>      int src, dst;
>      bool is_asymmetrical = false;
>      int nb_numa_nodes = ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
> +    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
>  
>      for (src = 0; src < nb_numa_nodes; src++) {
>          for (dst = src; dst < nb_numa_nodes; dst++) {
> @@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ static void complete_init_numa_distance(MachineState *ms)
>  {
>      int src, dst;
>      int nb_numa_nodes = ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
> +    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
>  
>      /* Fixup NUMA distance by symmetric policy because if it is an
>       * asymmetric distance table, it should be a complete table and
> @@ -363,6 +364,7 @@ void numa_complete_configuration(MachineState *ms)
>  {
>      int i;
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> +    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
>  
>      /*
>       * If memory hotplug is enabled (slots > 0) but without '-numa'
> @@ -534,8 +536,8 @@ void memory_region_allocate_system_memory(MemoryRegion *mr, Object *owner,
>  
>      memory_region_init(mr, owner, name, ram_size);
>      for (i = 0; i < ms->numa_state->num_nodes; i++) {
> -        uint64_t size = numa_info[i].node_mem;
> -        HostMemoryBackend *backend = numa_info[i].node_memdev;
> +        uint64_t size = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
> +        HostMemoryBackend *backend = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_memdev;
>          if (!backend) {
>              continue;
>          }
> @@ -594,6 +596,7 @@ static void numa_stat_memory_devices(NumaNodeMem node_mem[])
>  void query_numa_node_mem(NumaNodeMem node_mem[], MachineState *ms)
>  {
>      int i;
> +    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
well, look line below where you care about NULL check and suddenly
you don't care about it being NULL right above that check.

>  
>      if (ms->numa_state == NULL || ms->numa_state->num_nodes <= 0) {
>          return;