All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: allow wide (u64) aligned stores for some fields of bpf_sock_addr
Date: Mon,  1 Jul 2019 09:31:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190701163103.237550-2-sdf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190701163103.237550-1-sdf@google.com>

Since commit cd17d7770578 ("bpf/tools: sync bpf.h") clang decided
that it can do a single u64 store into user_ip6[2] instead of two
separate u32 ones:

 #  17: (18) r2 = 0x100000000000000
 #  ; ctx->user_ip6[2] = bpf_htonl(DST_REWRITE_IP6_2);
 #  19: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +16) = r2
 #  invalid bpf_context access off=16 size=8

From the compiler point of view it does look like a correct thing
to do, so let's support it on the kernel side.

Credit to Andrii Nakryiko for a proper implementation of
bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok.

Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Fixes: cd17d7770578 ("bpf/tools: sync bpf.h")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 include/linux/filter.h   |  6 ++++++
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  4 ++--
 net/core/filter.c        | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 340f7d648974..3901007e36f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -746,6 +746,12 @@ bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default)
 	return size <= size_default && (size & (size - 1)) == 0;
 }
 
+#define bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off, size, type, field)			\
+	(size == sizeof(__u64) &&					\
+	off >= offsetof(type, field) &&					\
+	off + sizeof(__u64) <= offsetofend(type, field) &&		\
+	off % sizeof(__u64) == 0)
+
 #define bpf_classic_proglen(fprog) (fprog->len * sizeof(fprog->filter[0]))
 
 static inline void bpf_prog_lock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index a396b516a2b2..586867fe6102 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3237,7 +3237,7 @@ struct bpf_sock_addr {
 	__u32 user_ip4;		/* Allows 1,2,4-byte read and 4-byte write.
 				 * Stored in network byte order.
 				 */
-	__u32 user_ip6[4];	/* Allows 1,2,4-byte read an 4-byte write.
+	__u32 user_ip6[4];	/* Allows 1,2,4-byte read an 4,8-byte write.
 				 * Stored in network byte order.
 				 */
 	__u32 user_port;	/* Allows 4-byte read and write.
@@ -3249,7 +3249,7 @@ struct bpf_sock_addr {
 	__u32 msg_src_ip4;	/* Allows 1,2,4-byte read an 4-byte write.
 				 * Stored in network byte order.
 				 */
-	__u32 msg_src_ip6[4];	/* Allows 1,2,4-byte read an 4-byte write.
+	__u32 msg_src_ip6[4];	/* Allows 1,2,4-byte read an 4,8-byte write.
 				 * Stored in network byte order.
 				 */
 	__bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_sock *, sk);
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index dc8534be12fc..5d33f2146dab 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -6849,6 +6849,16 @@ static bool sock_addr_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 			if (!bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, size_default))
 				return false;
 		} else {
+			if (bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off, size,
+						  struct bpf_sock_addr,
+						  user_ip6))
+				return true;
+
+			if (bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off, size,
+						  struct bpf_sock_addr,
+						  msg_src_ip6))
+				return true;
+
 			if (size != size_default)
 				return false;
 		}
@@ -7689,9 +7699,6 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
 /* SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF() has semantic similar to
  * SOCK_ADDR_LOAD_NESTED_FIELD_SIZE_OFF() but for store operation.
  *
- * It doesn't support SIZE argument though since narrow stores are not
- * supported for now.
- *
  * In addition it uses Temporary Field TF (member of struct S) as the 3rd
  * "register" since two registers available in convert_ctx_access are not
  * enough: we can't override neither SRC, since it contains value to store, nor
@@ -7699,7 +7706,7 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
  * instructions. But we need a temporary place to save pointer to nested
  * structure whose field we want to store to.
  */
-#define SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, OFF, TF)		       \
+#define SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, SIZE, OFF, TF)	       \
 	do {								       \
 		int tmp_reg = BPF_REG_9;				       \
 		if (si->src_reg == tmp_reg || si->dst_reg == tmp_reg)	       \
@@ -7710,8 +7717,7 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
 				      offsetof(S, TF));			       \
 		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(S, F), tmp_reg,	       \
 				      si->dst_reg, offsetof(S, F));	       \
-		*insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(					       \
-			BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(NS, NF), tmp_reg, si->src_reg,	       \
+		*insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(SIZE, tmp_reg, si->src_reg,	       \
 			bpf_target_off(NS, NF, FIELD_SIZEOF(NS, NF),	       \
 				       target_size)			       \
 				+ OFF);					       \
@@ -7723,8 +7729,8 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
 						      TF)		       \
 	do {								       \
 		if (type == BPF_WRITE) {				       \
-			SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, OFF,    \
-							 TF);		       \
+			SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, SIZE,   \
+							 OFF, TF);	       \
 		} else {						       \
 			SOCK_ADDR_LOAD_NESTED_FIELD_SIZE_OFF(		       \
 				S, NS, F, NF, SIZE, OFF);  \
-- 
2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-01 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-01 16:31 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: allow wide (u64) aligned stores for some fields of bpf_sock_addr Stanislav Fomichev
2019-07-01 16:31 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2019-07-01 16:54   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] " Andrii Nakryiko
2019-07-01 17:34     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-07-01 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf: sync bpf.h to tools/ Stanislav Fomichev
2019-07-01 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: add verifier tests for wide stores Stanislav Fomichev
2019-07-01 16:55   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190701163103.237550-2-sdf@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.