From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] perf diff: Link same basic blocks among different data
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:17:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190702161739.GK15462@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561713784-30533-6-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Em Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 05:23:02PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> The target is to compare the performance difference (cycles
> diff) for the same basic blocks in different data files.
>
> The same basic block means same function, same start address
> and same end address. This patch finds the same basic blocks
> from different data files and link them together and resort
> by the cycles diff.
>
> v3:
> ---
> The block stuffs are maintained by new structure 'block_hist',
> so this patch is update accordingly.
>
> v2:
> ---
> Since now the basic block hists is changed to per symbol,
> the patch only links the basic block hists for the same
> symbol in different data files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> index 83b8c0f..823f162 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> @@ -641,6 +641,85 @@ static int process_block_per_sym(struct hist_entry *he)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int block_pair_cmp(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b)
> +{
> + struct block_info *bi_a = a->block_info;
> + struct block_info *bi_b = b->block_info;
> + int cmp;
> +
> + if (!bi_a->sym || !bi_b->sym)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (bi_a->sym->name && bi_b->sym->name) {
> + cmp = strcmp(bi_a->sym->name, bi_b->sym->name);
> + if ((!cmp) && (bi_a->start == bi_b->start) &&
> + (bi_a->end == bi_b->end)) {
> + return 0;
> + }
builtin-diff.c:658:17: error: address of array 'bi_a->sym->name' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
if (bi_a->sym->name && bi_b->sym->name) {
~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ ~~
builtin-diff.c:658:36: error: address of array 'bi_b->sym->name' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
if (bi_a->sym->name && bi_b->sym->name) {
Because:
struct symbol *symbol__new(u64 start, u64 len, u8 binding, u8 type, const char *name)
{
size_t namelen = strlen(name) + 1;
struct symbol *sym = calloc(1, (symbol_conf.priv_size +
sizeof(*sym) + namelen));
So it will be at least a strlen(sym->name) == 0, i.e. we can use it
without checking anything.
I'm chanign it to do the cmp straight away
> + }
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +static struct hist_entry *get_block_pair(struct hist_entry *he,
> + struct hists *hists_pair)
> +{
> + struct rb_root_cached *root = hists_pair->entries_in;
> + struct rb_node *next = rb_first_cached(root);
> + int cmp;
> +
> + while (next != NULL) {
> + struct hist_entry *he_pair = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry,
> + rb_node_in);
> +
> + next = rb_next(&he_pair->rb_node_in);
> +
> + cmp = block_pair_cmp(he_pair, he);
> + if (!cmp)
> + return he_pair;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void compute_cycles_diff(struct hist_entry *he,
> + struct hist_entry *pair)
> +{
> + pair->diff.computed = true;
> + if (pair->block_info->num && he->block_info->num) {
> + pair->diff.cycles =
> + pair->block_info->cycles_aggr / pair->block_info->num_aggr -
> + he->block_info->cycles_aggr / he->block_info->num_aggr;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void block_hists_match(struct hists *hists_base,
> + struct hists *hists_pair)
> +{
> + struct rb_root_cached *root = hists_base->entries_in;
> + struct rb_node *next = rb_first_cached(root);
> +
> + while (next != NULL) {
> + struct hist_entry *he = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry,
> + rb_node_in);
> + struct hist_entry *pair = get_block_pair(he, hists_pair);
> +
> + next = rb_next(&he->rb_node_in);
> +
> + if (pair) {
> + hist_entry__add_pair(pair, he);
> + compute_cycles_diff(he, pair);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int filter_cb(struct hist_entry *he, void *arg __maybe_unused)
> +{
> + /* Skip the calculation of column length in output_resort */
> + he->filtered = true;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void hists__precompute(struct hists *hists)
> {
> struct rb_root_cached *root;
> @@ -653,6 +732,7 @@ static void hists__precompute(struct hists *hists)
>
> next = rb_first_cached(root);
> while (next != NULL) {
> + struct block_hist *bh, *pair_bh;
> struct hist_entry *he, *pair;
> struct data__file *d;
> int i;
> @@ -681,6 +761,16 @@ static void hists__precompute(struct hists *hists)
> break;
> case COMPUTE_CYCLES:
> process_block_per_sym(pair);
> + bh = container_of(he, struct block_hist, he);
> + pair_bh = container_of(pair, struct block_hist,
> + he);
> +
> + if (bh->valid && pair_bh->valid) {
> + block_hists_match(&bh->block_hists,
> + &pair_bh->block_hists);
> + hists__output_resort_cb(&pair_bh->block_hists,
> + NULL, filter_cb);
> + }
> break;
> default:
> BUG_ON(1);
> --
> 2.7.4
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-02 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-28 9:22 [PATCH v6 0/7] perf diff: diff cycles at basic block level Jin Yao
2019-06-28 8:02 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-07-02 15:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-06-28 9:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] perf util: Create block_info structure Jin Yao
2019-07-03 14:32 ` [tip:perf/core] perf symbol: " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2019-06-28 9:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] perf util: Add block_info in hist_entry Jin Yao
2019-07-03 14:33 ` [tip:perf/core] perf hists: " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2019-06-28 9:23 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] perf diff: Check if all data files with branch stacks Jin Yao
2019-07-03 14:34 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2019-06-28 9:23 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] perf diff: Use hists to manage basic blocks per symbol Jin Yao
2019-07-03 14:35 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2019-06-28 9:23 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] perf diff: Link same basic blocks among different data Jin Yao
2019-07-02 16:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2019-07-02 16:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-07-03 1:07 ` Jin, Yao
2019-07-03 14:35 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2019-06-28 9:23 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] perf diff: Print the basic block cycles diff Jin Yao
2019-07-03 14:36 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2019-06-28 9:23 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] perf diff: Documentation -c cycles option Jin Yao
2019-07-03 14:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190702161739.GK15462@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.