All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] waitqueue: fix clang -Wuninitialized warnings
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 10:58:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190703175845.GA68011@archlinux-epyc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190703081119.209976-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When CONFIG_LOCKDEP is set, every use of DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK()
> produces an annoying warning from clang, which is particularly annoying
> for allmodconfig builds:
> 
> fs/namei.c:1646:34: error: variable 'wq' is uninitialized when used within its own initialization [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
>         DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(wq);
>                                         ^~
> include/linux/wait.h:74:63: note: expanded from macro 'DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK'
>         struct wait_queue_head name = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name)
>                                ~~~~                                  ^~~~
> include/linux/wait.h:72:33: note: expanded from macro '__WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK'
>         ({ init_waitqueue_head(&name); name; })
>                                        ^~~~
> 
> After playing with it for a while, I have found a way to rephrase the
> macro in a way that should work well with both gcc and clang and not
> produce this warning. The open-coded __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK
> is a little more verbose than the original version by Peter Zijlstra,
> but avoids the gcc-ism that suppresses warnings when assigning a
> variable to itself.
> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thank you for sending the fix for these warnings, they are the last
major ones that I can see across various defconfig and allyesconfig
testing. This resolves all of them.

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-03 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-03  8:10 [PATCH] waitqueue: fix clang -Wuninitialized warnings Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-03 17:58 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-07-09 19:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-12  7:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12  0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-12  7:45   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-12  7:54     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-12 14:50       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-12 16:48     ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190703175845.GA68011@archlinux-epyc \
    --to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.