hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal

hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi Jérôme, Ben and Jason,

below is a series against the hmm tree which fixes up the mmap_sem
locking in nouveau and while at it also removes leftover legacy HMM APIs
only used by nouveau.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi Jérôme, Ben and Jason,

below is a series against the hmm tree which fixes up the mmap_sem
locking in nouveau and while at it also removes leftover legacy HMM APIs
only used by nouveau.

[PATCH 1/5] mm: return valid info from hmm_range_unregister

[Christoph Hellwig]

Checking range->valid is trivial and has no meaningful cost, but
nicely simplifies the fastpath in typical callers.  Also remove the
hmm_vma_range_done function, which now is a trivial wrapper around
hmm_range_unregister.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c |  2 +-
 include/linux/hmm.h                   | 11 +----------
 mm/hmm.c                              |  7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index 8c92374afcf2..9d40114d7949 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 		ret = hmm_vma_fault(&svmm->mirror, &range, true);
 		if (ret == 0) {
 			mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
-			if (!hmm_vma_range_done(&range)) {
+			if (!hmm_range_unregister(&range)) {
 				mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
 				goto again;
 			}
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index b8a08b2a10ca..6b55e59fd8e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
 		       unsigned long start,
 		       unsigned long end,
 		       unsigned page_shift);
-void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range);
+bool hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range);
 long hmm_range_snapshot(struct hmm_range *range);
 long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block);
 long hmm_range_dma_map(struct hmm_range *range,
@@ -484,15 +484,6 @@ long hmm_range_dma_unmap(struct hmm_range *range,
  */
 #define HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT 1000
 
-/* This is a temporary helper to avoid merge conflict between trees. */
-static inline bool hmm_vma_range_done(struct hmm_range *range)
-{
-	bool ret = hmm_range_valid(range);
-
-	hmm_range_unregister(range);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /* This is a temporary helper to avoid merge conflict between trees. */
 static inline int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror,
 				struct hmm_range *range, bool block)
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index d48b9283725a..ac238d3f1f4e 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -917,11 +917,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_register);
  *
  * Range struct is used to track updates to the CPU page table after a call to
  * hmm_range_register(). See include/linux/hmm.h for how to use it.
+ *
+ * Return:	%true if the range was still valid at the time of unregistering,
+ *		else %false.
  */
-void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
+bool hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
 {
 	struct hmm *hmm = range->hmm;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	bool ret = range->valid;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
 	list_del_init(&range->list);
@@ -938,6 +942,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
 	 */
 	range->valid = false;
 	memset(&range->hmm, POISON_INUSE, sizeof(range->hmm));
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_unregister);
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

[PATCH 1/5] mm: return valid info from hmm_range_unregister

[Christoph Hellwig]

Checking range->valid is trivial and has no meaningful cost, but
nicely simplifies the fastpath in typical callers.  Also remove the
hmm_vma_range_done function, which now is a trivial wrapper around
hmm_range_unregister.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c |  2 +-
 include/linux/hmm.h                   | 11 +----------
 mm/hmm.c                              |  7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index 8c92374afcf2..9d40114d7949 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 		ret = hmm_vma_fault(&svmm->mirror, &range, true);
 		if (ret == 0) {
 			mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
-			if (!hmm_vma_range_done(&range)) {
+			if (!hmm_range_unregister(&range)) {
 				mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
 				goto again;
 			}
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index b8a08b2a10ca..6b55e59fd8e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
 		       unsigned long start,
 		       unsigned long end,
 		       unsigned page_shift);
-void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range);
+bool hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range);
 long hmm_range_snapshot(struct hmm_range *range);
 long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block);
 long hmm_range_dma_map(struct hmm_range *range,
@@ -484,15 +484,6 @@ long hmm_range_dma_unmap(struct hmm_range *range,
  */
 #define HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT 1000
 
-/* This is a temporary helper to avoid merge conflict between trees. */
-static inline bool hmm_vma_range_done(struct hmm_range *range)
-{
-	bool ret = hmm_range_valid(range);
-
-	hmm_range_unregister(range);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /* This is a temporary helper to avoid merge conflict between trees. */
 static inline int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror,
 				struct hmm_range *range, bool block)
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index d48b9283725a..ac238d3f1f4e 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -917,11 +917,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_register);
  *
  * Range struct is used to track updates to the CPU page table after a call to
  * hmm_range_register(). See include/linux/hmm.h for how to use it.
+ *
+ * Return:	%true if the range was still valid at the time of unregistering,
+ *		else %false.
  */
-void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
+bool hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
 {
 	struct hmm *hmm = range->hmm;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	bool ret = range->valid;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
 	list_del_init(&range->list);
@@ -938,6 +942,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
 	 */
 	range->valid = false;
 	memset(&range->hmm, POISON_INUSE, sizeof(range->hmm));
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_unregister);
 
-- 
2.20.1

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: return valid info from hmm_range_unregister

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:44:58AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Checking range->valid is trivial and has no meaningful cost, but
> nicely simplifies the fastpath in typical callers.  

It should not be the typical caller..

> hmm_vma_range_done function, which now is a trivial wrapper around
> hmm_range_unregister.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c |  2 +-
>  include/linux/hmm.h                   | 11 +----------
>  mm/hmm.c                              |  7 ++++++-
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index 8c92374afcf2..9d40114d7949 100644
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
>  		ret = hmm_vma_fault(&svmm->mirror, &range, true);
>  		if (ret == 0) {
>  			mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
> -			if (!hmm_vma_range_done(&range)) {
> +			if (!hmm_range_unregister(&range)) {
>  				mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
>  				goto again;
>  			}

In this case if we take the 'goto again' then we are pointlessly
removing and re-adding the range.

The pattern is supposed to be:

    hmm_range_register()
again:
    .. read page tables ..
    lock
    if (!hmm_range_valid())
        unlock
        goto again
    .. setup device ..
    unlock
    hmm_range_unregister()

I don't think the API should be encouraging some shortcut here..

We can't do the above pattern because the old hmm_vma API didn't allow
it, which is presumably a reason why it is obsolete.

I'd rather see drivers move to a consistent pattern so we can then
easily hoist the seqcount lock scheme into some common mmu notifier
code, as discussed.

Jason
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: return valid info from hmm_range_unregister

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:44:58AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Checking range->valid is trivial and has no meaningful cost, but
> nicely simplifies the fastpath in typical callers.  

It should not be the typical caller..

> hmm_vma_range_done function, which now is a trivial wrapper around
> hmm_range_unregister.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c |  2 +-
>  include/linux/hmm.h                   | 11 +----------
>  mm/hmm.c                              |  7 ++++++-
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index 8c92374afcf2..9d40114d7949 100644
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
>  		ret = hmm_vma_fault(&svmm->mirror, &range, true);
>  		if (ret == 0) {
>  			mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
> -			if (!hmm_vma_range_done(&range)) {
> +			if (!hmm_range_unregister(&range)) {
>  				mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
>  				goto again;
>  			}

In this case if we take the 'goto again' then we are pointlessly
removing and re-adding the range.

The pattern is supposed to be:

    hmm_range_register()
again:
    .. read page tables ..
    lock
    if (!hmm_range_valid())
        unlock
        goto again
    .. setup device ..
    unlock
    hmm_range_unregister()

I don't think the API should be encouraging some shortcut here..

We can't do the above pattern because the old hmm_vma API didn't allow
it, which is presumably a reason why it is obsolete.

I'd rather see drivers move to a consistent pattern so we can then
easily hoist the seqcount lock scheme into some common mmu notifier
code, as discussed.

Jason

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: return valid info from hmm_range_unregister

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:00:50PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I don't think the API should be encouraging some shortcut here..
> 
> We can't do the above pattern because the old hmm_vma API didn't allow
> it, which is presumably a reason why it is obsolete.
> 
> I'd rather see drivers move to a consistent pattern so we can then
> easily hoist the seqcount lock scheme into some common mmu notifier
> code, as discussed.

So you don't like the version in amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages_done in
linux-next either?

I can remove this and just move hmm_vma_range_done to nouveau instead.
Let me know if you have other comments before I resend.  Note that
I'll probably be offline Thu-Sun this week.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: return valid info from hmm_range_unregister

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:00:50PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I don't think the API should be encouraging some shortcut here..
> 
> We can't do the above pattern because the old hmm_vma API didn't allow
> it, which is presumably a reason why it is obsolete.
> 
> I'd rather see drivers move to a consistent pattern so we can then
> easily hoist the seqcount lock scheme into some common mmu notifier
> code, as discussed.

So you don't like the version in amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages_done in
linux-next either?

I can remove this and just move hmm_vma_range_done to nouveau instead.
Let me know if you have other comments before I resend.  Note that
I'll probably be offline Thu-Sun this week.

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: return valid info from hmm_range_unregister

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:28:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:00:50PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > I don't think the API should be encouraging some shortcut here..
> > 
> > We can't do the above pattern because the old hmm_vma API didn't allow
> > it, which is presumably a reason why it is obsolete.
> > 
> > I'd rather see drivers move to a consistent pattern so we can then
> > easily hoist the seqcount lock scheme into some common mmu notifier
> > code, as discussed.
> 
> So you don't like the version in amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages_done in
> linux-next either?

I looked at this for 5 mins, and I can't see the key elements of the
collision retry lock:

- Where is the retry loop?
- Where is the lock around the final test to valid prior to using
  the output of range?

For instance looking at amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl()..

We can't be holding a lock when we do hmm_range_wait_until_valid()
(inside amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages), otherwise it deadlocks, and
there are not other locks that would encompass the final is_valid check.

And amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl() looks like a syscall entry point, so
having it fail just because the lock collided (ie is_valid == false)
can't possibly be the right thing.

I'm also unclear when the device data is updated in that sequence..

So.. I think this locking is wrong. Maybe AMD team can explain how it
should work?

Jason

[PATCH 2/5] mm: always return EBUSY for invalid ranges in hmm_range_{fault, snapshot}

[Christoph Hellwig]

We should not have two different error codes for the same condition.  In
addition this really complicates the code due to the special handling of
EAGAIN that drops the mmap_sem due to the FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY logic
in the core vm.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
---
 Documentation/vm/hmm.rst |  2 +-
 mm/hmm.c                 | 10 ++++------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/vm/hmm.rst b/Documentation/vm/hmm.rst
index 7d90964abbb0..710ce1c701bf 100644
--- a/Documentation/vm/hmm.rst
+++ b/Documentation/vm/hmm.rst
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ The usage pattern is::
       ret = hmm_range_snapshot(&range);
       if (ret) {
           up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-          if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+          if (ret == -EBUSY) {
             /*
              * No need to check hmm_range_wait_until_valid() return value
              * on retry we will get proper error with hmm_range_snapshot()
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index ac238d3f1f4e..3abc2e3c1e9f 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_unregister);
  * @range: range
  * Return: -EINVAL if invalid argument, -ENOMEM out of memory, -EPERM invalid
  *          permission (for instance asking for write and range is read only),
- *          -EAGAIN if you need to retry, -EFAULT invalid (ie either no valid
+ *          -EBUSY if you need to retry, -EFAULT invalid (ie either no valid
  *          vma or it is illegal to access that range), number of valid pages
  *          in range->pfns[] (from range start address).
  *
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ long hmm_range_snapshot(struct hmm_range *range)
 	do {
 		/* If range is no longer valid force retry. */
 		if (!range->valid)
-			return -EAGAIN;
+			return -EBUSY;
 
 		vma = find_vma(hmm->mm, start);
 		if (vma == NULL || (vma->vm_flags & device_vma))
@@ -1067,10 +1067,8 @@ long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block)
 
 	do {
 		/* If range is no longer valid force retry. */
-		if (!range->valid) {
-			up_read(&hmm->mm->mmap_sem);
-			return -EAGAIN;
-		}
+		if (!range->valid)
+			return -EBUSY;
 
 		vma = find_vma(hmm->mm, start);
 		if (vma == NULL || (vma->vm_flags & device_vma))
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

[PATCH 2/5] mm: always return EBUSY for invalid ranges in hmm_range_{fault,snapshot}

[Christoph Hellwig]

We should not have two different error codes for the same condition.  In
addition this really complicates the code due to the special handling of
EAGAIN that drops the mmap_sem due to the FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY logic
in the core vm.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
---
 Documentation/vm/hmm.rst |  2 +-
 mm/hmm.c                 | 10 ++++------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/vm/hmm.rst b/Documentation/vm/hmm.rst
index 7d90964abbb0..710ce1c701bf 100644
--- a/Documentation/vm/hmm.rst
+++ b/Documentation/vm/hmm.rst
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ The usage pattern is::
       ret = hmm_range_snapshot(&range);
       if (ret) {
           up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-          if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+          if (ret == -EBUSY) {
             /*
              * No need to check hmm_range_wait_until_valid() return value
              * on retry we will get proper error with hmm_range_snapshot()
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index ac238d3f1f4e..3abc2e3c1e9f 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_unregister);
  * @range: range
  * Return: -EINVAL if invalid argument, -ENOMEM out of memory, -EPERM invalid
  *          permission (for instance asking for write and range is read only),
- *          -EAGAIN if you need to retry, -EFAULT invalid (ie either no valid
+ *          -EBUSY if you need to retry, -EFAULT invalid (ie either no valid
  *          vma or it is illegal to access that range), number of valid pages
  *          in range->pfns[] (from range start address).
  *
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ long hmm_range_snapshot(struct hmm_range *range)
 	do {
 		/* If range is no longer valid force retry. */
 		if (!range->valid)
-			return -EAGAIN;
+			return -EBUSY;
 
 		vma = find_vma(hmm->mm, start);
 		if (vma == NULL || (vma->vm_flags & device_vma))
@@ -1067,10 +1067,8 @@ long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block)
 
 	do {
 		/* If range is no longer valid force retry. */
-		if (!range->valid) {
-			up_read(&hmm->mm->mmap_sem);
-			return -EAGAIN;
-		}
+		if (!range->valid)
+			return -EBUSY;
 
 		vma = find_vma(hmm->mm, start);
 		if (vma == NULL || (vma->vm_flags & device_vma))
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH 5/5] mm: remove the legacy hmm_pfn_* APIs

[Christoph Hellwig]

Switch the one remaining user in nouveau over to its replacement,
and remove all the wrappers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c |  2 +-
 include/linux/hmm.h                    | 34 --------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
index 42c026010938..b9ced2e61667 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
 		struct page *page;
 		uint64_t addr;
 
-		page = hmm_pfn_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
+		page = hmm_device_entry_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
 		if (page == NULL)
 			continue;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 657606f48796..cdcd78627393 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -290,40 +290,6 @@ static inline uint64_t hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
 		range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
 }
 
-/*
- * Old API:
- * hmm_pfn_to_page()
- * hmm_pfn_to_pfn()
- * hmm_pfn_from_page()
- * hmm_pfn_from_pfn()
- *
- * This are the OLD API please use new API, it is here to avoid cross-tree
- * merge painfullness ie we convert things to new API in stages.
- */
-static inline struct page *hmm_pfn_to_page(const struct hmm_range *range,
-					   uint64_t pfn)
-{
-	return hmm_device_entry_to_page(range, pfn);
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long hmm_pfn_to_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
-					   uint64_t pfn)
-{
-	return hmm_device_entry_to_pfn(range, pfn);
-}
-
-static inline uint64_t hmm_pfn_from_page(const struct hmm_range *range,
-					 struct page *page)
-{
-	return hmm_device_entry_from_page(range, page);
-}
-
-static inline uint64_t hmm_pfn_from_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
-					unsigned long pfn)
-{
-	return hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range, pfn);
-}
-
 /*
  * Mirroring: how to synchronize device page table with CPU page table.
  *
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

[PATCH 5/5] mm: remove the legacy hmm_pfn_* APIs

[Christoph Hellwig]

Switch the one remaining user in nouveau over to its replacement,
and remove all the wrappers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c |  2 +-
 include/linux/hmm.h                    | 34 --------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
index 42c026010938..b9ced2e61667 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
 		struct page *page;
 		uint64_t addr;
 
-		page = hmm_pfn_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
+		page = hmm_device_entry_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
 		if (page == NULL)
 			continue;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 657606f48796..cdcd78627393 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -290,40 +290,6 @@ static inline uint64_t hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
 		range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
 }
 
-/*
- * Old API:
- * hmm_pfn_to_page()
- * hmm_pfn_to_pfn()
- * hmm_pfn_from_page()
- * hmm_pfn_from_pfn()
- *
- * This are the OLD API please use new API, it is here to avoid cross-tree
- * merge painfullness ie we convert things to new API in stages.
- */
-static inline struct page *hmm_pfn_to_page(const struct hmm_range *range,
-					   uint64_t pfn)
-{
-	return hmm_device_entry_to_page(range, pfn);
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long hmm_pfn_to_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
-					   uint64_t pfn)
-{
-	return hmm_device_entry_to_pfn(range, pfn);
-}
-
-static inline uint64_t hmm_pfn_from_page(const struct hmm_range *range,
-					 struct page *page)
-{
-	return hmm_device_entry_from_page(range, page);
-}
-
-static inline uint64_t hmm_pfn_from_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
-					unsigned long pfn)
-{
-	return hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range, pfn);
-}
-
 /*
  * Mirroring: how to synchronize device page table with CPU page table.
  *
-- 
2.20.1

Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove the legacy hmm_pfn_* APIs

[Ralph Campbell]

On 7/3/19 11:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Switch the one remaining user in nouveau over to its replacement,
> and remove all the wrappers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c |  2 +-
>   include/linux/hmm.h                    | 34 --------------------------
>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 42c026010938..b9ced2e61667 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		struct page *page;
>   		uint64_t addr;
>   
> -		page = hmm_pfn_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
> +		page = hmm_device_entry_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
>   		if (page == NULL)
>   			continue;
>   
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index 657606f48796..cdcd78627393 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -290,40 +290,6 @@ static inline uint64_t hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
>   		range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
>   }
>   
> -/*
> - * Old API:
> - * hmm_pfn_to_page()
> - * hmm_pfn_to_pfn()
> - * hmm_pfn_from_page()
> - * hmm_pfn_from_pfn()
> - *
> - * This are the OLD API please use new API, it is here to avoid cross-tree
> - * merge painfullness ie we convert things to new API in stages.
> - */
> -static inline struct page *hmm_pfn_to_page(const struct hmm_range *range,
> -					   uint64_t pfn)
> -{
> -	return hmm_device_entry_to_page(range, pfn);
> -}
> -
> -static inline unsigned long hmm_pfn_to_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
> -					   uint64_t pfn)
> -{
> -	return hmm_device_entry_to_pfn(range, pfn);
> -}
> -
> -static inline uint64_t hmm_pfn_from_page(const struct hmm_range *range,
> -					 struct page *page)
> -{
> -	return hmm_device_entry_from_page(range, page);
> -}
> -
> -static inline uint64_t hmm_pfn_from_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
> -					unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> -	return hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range, pfn);
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * Mirroring: how to synchronize device page table with CPU page table.
>    *
> 

Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove the legacy hmm_pfn_* APIs

[Ralph Campbell]

On 7/3/19 11:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Switch the one remaining user in nouveau over to its replacement,
> and remove all the wrappers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c |  2 +-
>   include/linux/hmm.h                    | 34 --------------------------
>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 42c026010938..b9ced2e61667 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		struct page *page;
>   		uint64_t addr;
>   
> -		page = hmm_pfn_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
> +		page = hmm_device_entry_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
>   		if (page == NULL)
>   			continue;
>   
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index 657606f48796..cdcd78627393 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -290,40 +290,6 @@ static inline uint64_t hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
>   		range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
>   }
>   
> -/*
> - * Old API:
> - * hmm_pfn_to_page()
> - * hmm_pfn_to_pfn()
> - * hmm_pfn_from_page()
> - * hmm_pfn_from_pfn()
> - *
> - * This are the OLD API please use new API, it is here to avoid cross-tree
> - * merge painfullness ie we convert things to new API in stages.
> - */
> -static inline struct page *hmm_pfn_to_page(const struct hmm_range *range,
> -					   uint64_t pfn)
> -{
> -	return hmm_device_entry_to_page(range, pfn);
> -}
> -
> -static inline unsigned long hmm_pfn_to_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
> -					   uint64_t pfn)
> -{
> -	return hmm_device_entry_to_pfn(range, pfn);
> -}
> -
> -static inline uint64_t hmm_pfn_from_page(const struct hmm_range *range,
> -					 struct page *page)
> -{
> -	return hmm_device_entry_from_page(range, page);
> -}
> -
> -static inline uint64_t hmm_pfn_from_pfn(const struct hmm_range *range,
> -					unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> -	return hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range, pfn);
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * Mirroring: how to synchronize device page table with CPU page table.
>    *
> 

[PATCH 3/5] mm: move hmm_vma_fault to nouveau

[Christoph Hellwig]

hmm_vma_fault is marked as a legacy API to get rid of, but seems to suit
the current nouveau flow.  Move it to the only user in preparation for
fixing a locking bug involving caller and callee.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/hmm.h                   | 54 ---------------------------
 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index 9d40114d7949..e831f4184a17 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -36,6 +36,13 @@
 #include <linux/sort.h>
 #include <linux/hmm.h>
 
+/*
+ * When waiting for mmu notifiers we need some kind of time out otherwise we
+ * could potentialy wait for ever, 1000ms ie 1s sounds like a long time to
+ * wait already.
+ */
+#define NOUVEAU_RANGE_FAULT_TIMEOUT 1000
+
 struct nouveau_svm {
 	struct nouveau_drm *drm;
 	struct mutex mutex;
@@ -475,6 +482,51 @@ nouveau_svm_fault_cache(struct nouveau_svm *svm,
 		fault->inst, fault->addr, fault->access);
 }
 
+static int
+nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range,
+		    bool block)
+{
+	long ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * With the old API the driver must set each individual entries with
+	 * the requested flags (valid, write, ...). So here we set the mask to
+	 * keep intact the entries provided by the driver and zero out the
+	 * default_flags.
+	 */
+	range->default_flags = 0;
+	range->pfn_flags_mask = -1UL;
+
+	ret = hmm_range_register(range, mirror,
+				 range->start, range->end,
+				 PAGE_SHIFT);
+	if (ret)
+		return (int)ret;
+
+	if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range, NOUVEAU_RANGE_FAULT_TIMEOUT)) {
+		/*
+		 * The mmap_sem was taken by driver we release it here and
+		 * returns -EAGAIN which correspond to mmap_sem have been
+		 * drop in the old API.
+		 */
+		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
+		return -EAGAIN;
+	}
+
+	ret = hmm_range_fault(range, block);
+	if (ret <= 0) {
+		if (ret == -EBUSY || !ret) {
+			/* Same as above, drop mmap_sem to match old API. */
+			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+		} else if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+		hmm_range_unregister(range);
+		return ret;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int
 nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 {
@@ -649,7 +701,7 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 		range.values = nouveau_svm_pfn_values;
 		range.pfn_shift = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_ADDR_SHIFT;
 again:
-		ret = hmm_vma_fault(&svmm->mirror, &range, true);
+		ret = nouveau_range_fault(&svmm->mirror, &range, true);
 		if (ret == 0) {
 			mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
 			if (!hmm_range_unregister(&range)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 6b55e59fd8e3..657606f48796 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -475,60 +475,6 @@ long hmm_range_dma_unmap(struct hmm_range *range,
 			 dma_addr_t *daddrs,
 			 bool dirty);
 
-/*
- * HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT - default timeout (ms) when waiting for a range
- *
- * When waiting for mmu notifiers we need some kind of time out otherwise we
- * could potentialy wait for ever, 1000ms ie 1s sounds like a long time to
- * wait already.
- */
-#define HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT 1000
-
-/* This is a temporary helper to avoid merge conflict between trees. */
-static inline int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror,
-				struct hmm_range *range, bool block)
-{
-	long ret;
-
-	/*
-	 * With the old API the driver must set each individual entries with
-	 * the requested flags (valid, write, ...). So here we set the mask to
-	 * keep intact the entries provided by the driver and zero out the
-	 * default_flags.
-	 */
-	range->default_flags = 0;
-	range->pfn_flags_mask = -1UL;
-
-	ret = hmm_range_register(range, mirror,
-				 range->start, range->end,
-				 PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (ret)
-		return (int)ret;
-
-	if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range, HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)) {
-		/*
-		 * The mmap_sem was taken by driver we release it here and
-		 * returns -EAGAIN which correspond to mmap_sem have been
-		 * drop in the old API.
-		 */
-		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
-		return -EAGAIN;
-	}
-
-	ret = hmm_range_fault(range, block);
-	if (ret <= 0) {
-		if (ret == -EBUSY || !ret) {
-			/* Same as above, drop mmap_sem to match old API. */
-			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
-			ret = -EBUSY;
-		} else if (ret == -EAGAIN)
-			ret = -EBUSY;
-		hmm_range_unregister(range);
-		return ret;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /* Below are for HMM internal use only! Not to be used by device driver! */
 static inline void hmm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH 4/5] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault

[Christoph Hellwig]

Currently nouveau_svm_fault expects nouveau_range_fault to never unlock
mmap_sem, but the latter unlocks it for a random selection of error
codes. Fix this up by always unlocking mmap_sem for non-zero return
values in nouveau_range_fault, and only unlocking it in the caller
for successful returns.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index e831f4184a17..c0cf7aeaefb3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -500,8 +500,10 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range,
 	ret = hmm_range_register(range, mirror,
 				 range->start, range->end,
 				 PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
 		return (int)ret;
+	}
 
 	if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range, NOUVEAU_RANGE_FAULT_TIMEOUT)) {
 		/*
@@ -515,15 +517,14 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range,
 
 	ret = hmm_range_fault(range, block);
 	if (ret <= 0) {
-		if (ret == -EBUSY || !ret) {
-			/* Same as above, drop mmap_sem to match old API. */
-			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
-			ret = -EBUSY;
-		} else if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+		if (ret == 0)
 			ret = -EBUSY;
+		if (ret != -EAGAIN)
+			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
 		hmm_range_unregister(range);
 		return ret;
 	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -718,8 +719,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 						NULL);
 			svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
 			mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
+			up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
 		}
-		up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
 
 		/* Cancel any faults in the window whose pages didn't manage
 		 * to keep their valid bit, or stay writeable when required.
-- 
2.20.1

Re: [PATCH 4/5] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault

[Ralph Campbell]

On 7/3/19 11:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently nouveau_svm_fault expects nouveau_range_fault to never unlock
> mmap_sem, but the latter unlocks it for a random selection of error
> codes. Fix this up by always unlocking mmap_sem for non-zero return
> values in nouveau_range_fault, and only unlocking it in the caller
> for successful returns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index e831f4184a17..c0cf7aeaefb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -500,8 +500,10 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range,

You can delete the comment "With the old API the driver must ..."
(not visible in the patch here).
I suggest moving the two assignments:
	range->default_flags = 0;
	range->pfn_flags_mask = -1UL;
to just above the "again:" where the other range.xxx fields are
initialized in nouveau_svm_fault().

>   	ret = hmm_range_register(range, mirror,
>   				 range->start, range->end,
>   				 PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
> +		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem; >   		return (int)ret;
> +	}
>   
>   	if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range, NOUVEAU_RANGE_FAULT_TIMEOUT)) {
>   		/*

You can delete this comment (only the first line is visible here)
since it is about the "old API".
Also, it should return -EBUSY not -EAGAIN since it means there was a
range invalidation collision (similar to hmm_range_fault() if
!range->valid).

> @@ -515,15 +517,14 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range,
>   
>   	ret = hmm_range_fault(range, block);

nouveau_range_fault() is only called with "block = true" so
could eliminate the block parameter and pass true here.

>   	if (ret <= 0) {
> -		if (ret == -EBUSY || !ret) {
> -			/* Same as above, drop mmap_sem to match old API. */
> -			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
> -			ret = -EBUSY;
> -		} else if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> +		if (ret == 0)
>   			ret = -EBUSY;
> +		if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> +			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);

Can ret == -EAGAIN happen if "block = true"?
Generally, I prefer the read_down()/read_up() in the same function
(i.e., nouveau_svm_fault()) but I can see why it should be here
if hmm_range_fault() can return with mmap_sem unlocked.

>   		hmm_range_unregister(range);
>   		return ret;
>   	}
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> @@ -718,8 +719,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
>   						NULL);
>   			svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
>   			mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
> +			up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
>   		}
> -		up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
>   

The "else" case should check for -EBUSY and goto again.

>   		/* Cancel any faults in the window whose pages didn't manage
>   		 * to keep their valid bit, or stay writeable when required.
> 

Re: [PATCH 4/5] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault

[Ralph Campbell]

On 7/3/19 11:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently nouveau_svm_fault expects nouveau_range_fault to never unlock
> mmap_sem, but the latter unlocks it for a random selection of error
> codes. Fix this up by always unlocking mmap_sem for non-zero return
> values in nouveau_range_fault, and only unlocking it in the caller
> for successful returns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index e831f4184a17..c0cf7aeaefb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -500,8 +500,10 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range,

You can delete the comment "With the old API the driver must ..."
(not visible in the patch here).
I suggest moving the two assignments:
	range->default_flags = 0;
	range->pfn_flags_mask = -1UL;
to just above the "again:" where the other range.xxx fields are
initialized in nouveau_svm_fault().

>   	ret = hmm_range_register(range, mirror,
>   				 range->start, range->end,
>   				 PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
> +		up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem; >   		return (int)ret;
> +	}
>   
>   	if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range, NOUVEAU_RANGE_FAULT_TIMEOUT)) {
>   		/*

You can delete this comment (only the first line is visible here)
since it is about the "old API".
Also, it should return -EBUSY not -EAGAIN since it means there was a
range invalidation collision (similar to hmm_range_fault() if
!range->valid).

> @@ -515,15 +517,14 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range,
>   
>   	ret = hmm_range_fault(range, block);

nouveau_range_fault() is only called with "block = true" so
could eliminate the block parameter and pass true here.

>   	if (ret <= 0) {
> -		if (ret == -EBUSY || !ret) {
> -			/* Same as above, drop mmap_sem to match old API. */
> -			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
> -			ret = -EBUSY;
> -		} else if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> +		if (ret == 0)
>   			ret = -EBUSY;
> +		if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> +			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);

Can ret == -EAGAIN happen if "block = true"?
Generally, I prefer the read_down()/read_up() in the same function
(i.e., nouveau_svm_fault()) but I can see why it should be here
if hmm_range_fault() can return with mmap_sem unlocked.

>   		hmm_range_unregister(range);
>   		return ret;
>   	}
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> @@ -718,8 +719,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
>   						NULL);
>   			svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
>   			mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
> +			up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
>   		}
> -		up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
>   

The "else" case should check for -EBUSY and goto again.

>   		/* Cancel any faults in the window whose pages didn't manage
>   		 * to keep their valid bit, or stay writeable when required.
> 

Re: [PATCH 4/5] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:46:02PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> You can delete the comment "With the old API the driver must ..."
> (not visible in the patch here).

Sure.

> I suggest moving the two assignments:
> 	range->default_flags = 0;
> 	range->pfn_flags_mask = -1UL;
> to just above the "again:" where the other range.xxx fields are
> initialized in nouveau_svm_fault().

For now I really just want to move the code around.  As Jason pointed
out the flow will need some major rework, and I'd rather not mess
with little things like this for now.  Especially as I assume Jerome
must have an update to the proper API ready given that he both
wrote that new API and the nouveau code.

> You can delete this comment (only the first line is visible here)
> since it is about the "old API".

Ok.

> Also, it should return -EBUSY not -EAGAIN since it means there was a
> range invalidation collision (similar to hmm_range_fault() if
> !range->valid).

Yes, probably.


>> @@ -515,15 +517,14 @@ nouveau_range_fault(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct hmm_range *range,
>>     	ret = hmm_range_fault(range, block);
>
> nouveau_range_fault() is only called with "block = true" so
> could eliminate the block parameter and pass true here.

Indeed.

>
>>   	if (ret <= 0) {
>> -		if (ret == -EBUSY || !ret) {
>> -			/* Same as above, drop mmap_sem to match old API. */
>> -			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
>> -			ret = -EBUSY;
>> -		} else if (ret == -EAGAIN)
>> +		if (ret == 0)
>>   			ret = -EBUSY;
>> +		if (ret != -EAGAIN)
>> +			up_read(&range->vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
>
> Can ret == -EAGAIN happen if "block = true"?

I don't think so, we can remove that.

> Generally, I prefer the read_down()/read_up() in the same function
> (i.e., nouveau_svm_fault()) but I can see why it should be here
> if hmm_range_fault() can return with mmap_sem unlocked.

Yes, in the long run this all needs a major cleanup..


>>   @@ -718,8 +719,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
>>   						NULL);
>>   			svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
>>   			mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
>> +			up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
>>   		}
>> -		up_read(&svmm->mm->mmap_sem);
>>   
>
> The "else" case should check for -EBUSY and goto again.

It should if I were trying to fix this.  But this is just code
inspection and I don't even have the hardware, so I'll have to leave
that for someone who can do real development on the driver.