All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] xfs: only allocate memory for scrubbing attributes when we need it
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 10:52:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190705145233.GG37448@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156158202408.495944.3341471232105593997.stgit@magnolia>

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:47:04PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> In examining a flame graph of time spent running xfs_scrub on various
> filesystems, I noticed that we spent nearly 7% of the total runtime on
> allocating a zeroed 65k buffer for every SCRUB_TYPE_XATTR invocation.
> We do this even if none of the attribute values were anywhere near 64k
> in size, even if there were no attribute blocks to check space on, and
> even if it just turns out there are no attributes at all.
> 
> Therefore, rearrange the xattr buffer setup code to support reallocating
> with a bigger buffer and redistribute the callers of that function so
> that we only allocate memory just prior to needing it, and only allocate
> as much as we need.  If we can't get memory with the ILOCK held we'll
> bail out with EDEADLOCK which will allocate the maximum memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/scrub/attr.c |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  fs/xfs/scrub/attr.h |    6 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/attr.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/attr.c
> index c20b6da1db84..09081d8ab34b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/attr.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/attr.c
...
> @@ -47,10 +53,23 @@ xchk_setup_xattr_buf(
>  	sz = 3 * sizeof(long) * BITS_TO_LONGS(sc->mp->m_attr_geo->blksize);
>  	sz = max_t(size_t, sz, value_size);
>  
> -	sc->buf = kmem_zalloc_large(sz, KM_SLEEP);
> -	if (!sc->buf)
> +	/*
> +	 * If there's already a buffer, figure out if we need to reallocate it
> +	 * to accomdate a larger size.

accommodate

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

> +	 */
> +	if (ab) {
> +		if (sz <= ab->sz)
> +			return 0;
> +		kmem_free(ab);
> +		sc->buf = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ab = kmem_zalloc_large(sizeof(*ab) + sz, flags);
> +	if (!ab)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	ab->sz = sz;
> +	sc->buf = ab;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -62,9 +81,16 @@ xchk_setup_xattr(
>  {
>  	int			error;
>  
> -	error = xchk_setup_xattr_buf(sc, XATTR_SIZE_MAX);
> -	if (error)
> -		return error;
> +	/*
> +	 * We failed to get memory while checking attrs, so this time try to
> +	 * get all the memory we're ever going to need.  Allocate the buffer
> +	 * without the inode lock held, which means we can sleep.
> +	 */
> +	if (sc->flags & XCHK_TRY_HARDER) {
> +		error = xchk_setup_xattr_buf(sc, XATTR_SIZE_MAX, KM_SLEEP);
> +		if (error)
> +			return error;
> +	}
>  
>  	return xchk_setup_inode_contents(sc, ip, 0);
>  }
> @@ -115,6 +141,19 @@ xchk_xattr_listent(
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Try to allocate enough memory to extrat the attr value.  If that
> +	 * doesn't work, we overload the seen_enough variable to convey
> +	 * the error message back to the main scrub function.
> +	 */
> +	error = xchk_setup_xattr_buf(sx->sc, valuelen, KM_MAYFAIL);
> +	if (error == -ENOMEM)
> +		error = -EDEADLOCK;
> +	if (error) {
> +		context->seen_enough = error;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	args.flags = ATTR_KERNOTIME;
>  	if (flags & XFS_ATTR_ROOT)
>  		args.flags |= ATTR_ROOT;
> @@ -128,7 +167,7 @@ xchk_xattr_listent(
>  	args.hashval = xfs_da_hashname(args.name, args.namelen);
>  	args.trans = context->tp;
>  	args.value = xchk_xattr_valuebuf(sx->sc);
> -	args.valuelen = XATTR_SIZE_MAX;
> +	args.valuelen = valuelen;
>  
>  	error = xfs_attr_get_ilocked(context->dp, &args);
>  	if (error == -EEXIST)
> @@ -281,16 +320,26 @@ xchk_xattr_block(
>  	struct xfs_attr_leafblock	*leaf = bp->b_addr;
>  	struct xfs_attr_leaf_entry	*ent;
>  	struct xfs_attr_leaf_entry	*entries;
> -	unsigned long			*usedmap = xchk_xattr_usedmap(ds->sc);
> +	unsigned long			*usedmap;
>  	char				*buf_end;
>  	size_t				off;
>  	__u32				last_hashval = 0;
>  	unsigned int			usedbytes = 0;
>  	unsigned int			hdrsize;
>  	int				i;
> +	int				error;
>  
>  	if (*last_checked == blk->blkno)
>  		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Allocate memory for block usage checking. */
> +	error = xchk_setup_xattr_buf(ds->sc, 0, KM_MAYFAIL);
> +	if (error == -ENOMEM)
> +		return -EDEADLOCK;
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +	usedmap = xchk_xattr_usedmap(ds->sc);
> +
>  	*last_checked = blk->blkno;
>  	bitmap_zero(usedmap, mp->m_attr_geo->blksize);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/attr.h b/fs/xfs/scrub/attr.h
> index 27e879aeaafc..13a1d2e8424d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/attr.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/attr.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
>   * Temporary storage for online scrub and repair of extended attributes.
>   */
>  struct xchk_xattr_buf {
> +	/* Size of @buf, in bytes. */
> +	size_t			sz;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Memory buffer -- either used for extracting attr values while
>  	 * walking the attributes; or for computing attr block bitmaps when
> @@ -62,6 +65,7 @@ xchk_xattr_dstmap(
>  			BITS_TO_LONGS(sc->mp->m_attr_geo->blksize);
>  }
>  
> -int xchk_setup_xattr_buf(struct xfs_scrub *sc, size_t value_size);
> +int xchk_setup_xattr_buf(struct xfs_scrub *sc, size_t value_size,
> +		xfs_km_flags_t flags);
>  
>  #endif	/* __XFS_SCRUB_ATTR_H__ */
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-05 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-26 20:46 [PATCH v2 0/6] xfs: scrub-related fixes Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 20:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: remove more ondisk directory corruption asserts Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:49   ` Brian Foster
2019-07-05 17:03     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 17:27       ` Brian Foster
2019-06-26 20:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: attribute scrub should use seen_enough to pass error values Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:49   ` Brian Foster
2019-07-05 16:46     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 20:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: refactor extended attribute buffer pointer functions Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:52   ` Brian Foster
2019-06-26 20:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: refactor attr scrub memory allocation function Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:52   ` Brian Foster
2019-06-26 20:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: only allocate memory for scrubbing attributes when we need it Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:52   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2019-07-05 16:49     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 20:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: online scrub needn't bother zeroing its temporary buffer Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 14:52   ` Brian Foster
2019-07-05 16:35     ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-05 17:26       ` Brian Foster
2019-07-05 17:57         ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190705145233.GG37448@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.