From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Christian Gromm <christian.gromm@microchip.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] staging: most: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 12:02:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190706100253.GA20497@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704153803.12739-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 05:38:00PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> For spinlocks the type spinlock_t should be used instead of "struct
> spinlock".
Why?
> Use spinlock_t for spinlock's definition.
Why? I agree it makes the code smaller, but why is this required?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-06 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-04 15:37 [PATCH 0/7] Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-04 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] crypto: ux500: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-26 12:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-26 12:32 ` Herbert Xu
2019-07-04 15:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] vmpressure: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-26 12:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-26 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-27 6:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:37 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/vgem: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-04 15:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] staging: most: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-06 10:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-07-06 21:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-15 19:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-07-26 11:22 ` [PATCH v2] staging: most: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() " Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-04 15:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] watchdog: ie6xx_wdt: Use spinlock_t " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-08 17:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-07-04 15:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] nfp: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-04 20:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-05 23:18 ` David Miller
2019-07-04 15:38 ` [PATCH 7/7] gpiolib: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-07-05 9:33 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-07-06 18:15 ` Linus Walleij
2019-07-04 15:39 ` [PATCH 0/7] " David Laight
2019-07-04 15:45 ` 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190706100253.GA20497@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=christian.gromm@microchip.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.