From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9CFC606A1 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BD220651 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729306AbfGHJbS (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jul 2019 05:31:18 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:56292 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729035AbfGHJbS (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jul 2019 05:31:18 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 35962C22F123AEC62D74; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:31:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.227.98.71) by DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:31:13 +0800 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:31:05 +0800 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol CC: linux-iio , Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: Patch ping? Message-ID: <20190708173105.00007834@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Huawei R&D UK Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.227.98.71] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:15:04 +0000 Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > just a ping about my patch to add correct available scan masks to inv_mpu6050 driver. > > Title is: [PATCH v2] iio: imu: mpu6050: add missing available scan masks > > Thanks for your feedback. > > Best regards, > JB Hi Jean-Baptiste, That one just came in after sent my final pull request for the merge window (which is now open). I'm traveling at the moment, so for simple, obviously correct patches I'm pretty much ignoring them as a delay at this stage makes no difference (there is no path upstream until after the merge window has closed) I'll get this particular one queued up as a fix one I'm back home next week. Thanks (and you were quite right to ping btw, I forgot to send out my normal I'll be traveling email) Jonathan