From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] s390: cpumodel: fix description for the new vector facility
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:41:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190708174152.5182c0ff.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708150931.93448-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:09:31 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> The new facility is called "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility"
> and not "Vector BCD enhancements facility 1". As the shortname might
> have already found its way into some backports lets keep vxbeh.
s/lets/let's/
>
> Fixes: 54d65de0b525 ("s390x/cpumodel: vector enhancements")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> index ef190e2fc783..3118a9f89228 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ DEF_FEAT(CMM_NT, "cmmnt", STFL, 147, "CMM: ESSA-enhancement (no translate) facil
> DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_ENH2, "vxeh2", STFL, 148, "Vector Enhancements facility 2")
> DEF_FEAT(ESORT_BASE, "esort-base", STFL, 150, "Enhanced-sort facility (excluding subfunctions)")
> DEF_FEAT(DEFLATE_BASE, "deflate-base", STFL, 151, "Deflate-conversion facility (excluding subfunctions)")
> -DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_BCD_ENH, "vxbeh", STFL, 152, "Vector BCD enhancements facility 1")
> +DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_BCD_ENH, "vxbeh", STFL, 152, "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility")
> DEF_FEAT(MSA_EXT_9, "msa9-base", STFL, 155, "Message-security-assist-extension-9 facility (excluding subfunctions)")
> DEF_FEAT(ETOKEN, "etoken", STFL, 156, "Etoken facility")
>
I like this one better than v1, as it seems less risky (and I think we
can live with the odd shortname; it's not like all facilities are named
in an obvious way...)
I'll queue this first thing tomorrow, unless someone objects.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-08 15:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] s390: cpumodel: fix description for the new vector facility Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-08 15:41 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-07-09 7:59 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190708174152.5182c0ff.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.