All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hmm tree
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:32:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190709123250.GF3436@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190709102137.421d1dd1@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:21:37AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:08:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the hmm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > mm/hmm.c: In function 'hmm_get_or_create':
> > mm/hmm.c:50:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_assert_held_exclusive'; did you mean 'lockdep_assert_held_once'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >   lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >   lockdep_assert_held_once
> > 
> > Caused by commit
> > 
> >   8a9320b7ec5d ("mm/hmm: Simplify hmm_get_or_create and make it reliable")
> > 
> > interacting with commit
> > 
> >   9ffbe8ac05db ("locking/lockdep: Rename lockdep_assert_held_exclusive() -> lockdep_assert_held_write()")
> > 
> > from the tip tree.
> > 
> > I have added the following merge fix.
> > 
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:05:59 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm/hmm: fixup for "locking/lockdep: Rename
> >  lockdep_assert_held_exclusive() -> lockdep_assert_held_write()"
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> >  mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> > index c1bdcef403ee..2ddbd589b207 100644
> > +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static struct hmm *hmm_get_or_create(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  {
> >  	struct hmm *hmm;
> >  
> > -	lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >  
> >  	/* Abuse the page_table_lock to also protect mm->hmm. */
> >  	spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static const struct mmu_notifier_ops hmm_mmu_notifier_ops = {
> >   */
> >  int hmm_mirror_register(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  {
> > -	lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >  
> >  	/* Sanity check */
> >  	if (!mm || !mirror || !mirror->ops)
> 
> I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
> Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

Ingo already sent the PR to Linus with the function rename, so I will
take care of it.

Thanks,
Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-09 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-01 11:08 linux-next: build failure after merge of the hmm tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09  0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 12:32   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-01 11:33 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01 23:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-03  1:28   ` Alex Deucher
2019-09-02 10:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-02 10:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-02 23:45   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-03  5:31     ` Dan Williams
2019-09-03  5:42       ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-03 23:11         ` Dan Williams
2019-11-14  5:34 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-14 12:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-06  9:35 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-06  9:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-06 16:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-06 16:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-12  4:19   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-12  4:19     ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-15 21:11     ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-15 21:11       ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-23  7:50 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-23 17:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-01 22:01 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190709123250.GF3436@mellanox.com \
    --to=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.