All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Vijay Kilary <vkilari@codeaurora.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jan Glauber <jglauber@marvell.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair <jnair@marvell.com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 02/19] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Remove redundant call to io_pgtable_tlb_sync()
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:19:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190711171927.28803-3-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190711171927.28803-1-will@kernel.org>

Commit b6b65ca20bc9 ("iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add support for non-strict
mode") added an unconditional call to io_pgtable_tlb_sync() immediately
after the case where we replace a block entry with a table entry during
an unmap() call. This is redundant, since the IOMMU API will call
iommu_tlb_sync() on this path and the patch in question mentions this:

 | To save having to reason about it too much, make sure the invalidation
 | in arm_lpae_split_blk_unmap() just performs its own unconditional sync
 | to minimise the window in which we're technically violating the break-
 | before-make requirement on a live mapping. This might work out redundant
 | with an outer-level sync for strict unmaps, but we'll never be splitting
 | blocks on a DMA fastpath anyway.

However, this sync gets in the way of deferred TLB invalidation for leaf
entries and is at best a questionable, unproven hack. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c | 1 -
 drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c     | 1 -
 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
index 35de9ebb500c..6a6d6bb438d9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
@@ -598,7 +598,6 @@ static size_t arm_v7s_split_blk_unmap(struct arm_v7s_io_pgtable *data,
 	}
 
 	io_pgtable_tlb_add_flush(&data->iop, iova, size, size, true);
-	io_pgtable_tlb_sync(&data->iop);
 	return size;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
index b4e624afd1bb..b696b6c139cc 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
@@ -594,7 +594,6 @@ static size_t arm_lpae_split_blk_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
 		tablep = iopte_deref(pte, data);
 	} else if (unmap_idx >= 0) {
 		io_pgtable_tlb_add_flush(&data->iop, iova, size, size, true);
-		io_pgtable_tlb_sync(&data->iop);
 		return size;
 	}
 
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-11 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-11 17:19 [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/19] iommu: Remove empty iommu_tlb_range_add() callback from iommu_ops Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Rename iommu_gather_ops to iommu_flush_ops Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/19] iommu: Introduce struct iommu_iotlb_gather for batching TLB flushes Will Deacon
2019-07-24  7:19   ` Joerg Roedel
2019-07-24  7:41     ` Will Deacon
2019-07-25  7:58       ` Joerg Roedel
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/19] iommu: Introduce iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/19] iommu: Pass struct iommu_iotlb_gather to ->unmap() and ->iotlb_sync() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Introduce tlb_flush_walk() and tlb_flush_leaf() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Hook up ->tlb_flush_walk() and ->tlb_flush_leaf() in drivers Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/19] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Call ->tlb_flush_walk() and ->tlb_flush_leaf() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Replace ->tlb_add_flush() with ->tlb_add_page() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Remove unused ->tlb_sync() callback Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Pass struct iommu_iotlb_gather to ->unmap() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Pass struct iommu_iotlb_gather to ->tlb_add_page() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Separate s/w and h/w views of prod and cons indexes Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop unused 'q' argument from Q_OVF macro Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move low-level queue fields out of arm_smmu_queue Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Operate directly on low-level queue where possible Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reduce contention during command-queue insertion Will Deacon
2019-07-19 11:04   ` John Garry
2019-07-24 12:15     ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:03       ` John Garry
2019-07-24 14:07         ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24  8:20   ` John Garry
2019-07-24 14:33     ` Will Deacon
2019-07-25 11:31       ` John Garry
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Defer TLB invalidation until ->iotlb_sync() Will Deacon
2019-07-19  4:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2019-07-24 12:28   ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24  9:58 ` John Garry
2019-07-24 12:20   ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:25     ` John Garry
2019-07-24 14:48       ` Will Deacon
2019-07-25 10:11         ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190711171927.28803-3-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=jglauber@marvell.com \
    --cc=jnair@marvell.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vkilari@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.