From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
izbyshev@ispras.ru, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
shasta@toxcorp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/*/cmdline rewrite
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 12:51:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190714095157.GA2276@avx2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wj_mrNnM-q_z95GcNB=Ab4LaUC6Bi6Q-+3Q9u9NC=3iDA@mail.gmail.com>
[re-add lists]
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 10:50:20AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 12:29 AM Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > /proc/*/cmdline continues to cause problems:
>
> If we're reverting this, then we should revert all the way back to the
> original fixed-length one that had the original semantics and was
> simple.
No, because all those Java applications have command lines measured in
dozens of kilobytes.
> What was the problem with the one-line fix instead?
The problem is that I can't even drag this trivia in out of _fear_ that
it is userspace observable:
https://marc.info/?t=155863429700002&r=1&w=4
[PATCH] elf: fix "start_code" evaluation
and yet the patch which did a regression and an infoleak continues
to be papered over and for which the only justification was
"simplify and clarify".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-14 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190713072855.GB23167@avx2>
2019-07-13 7:32 ` [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/*/cmdline rewrite Alexey Dobriyan
2019-07-13 14:00 ` Alexey Izbyshev
2019-07-14 4:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-07-14 5:02 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wj_mrNnM-q_z95GcNB=Ab4LaUC6Bi6Q-+3Q9u9NC=3iDA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-07-14 9:51 ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2019-07-14 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190714095157.GA2276@avx2 \
--to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=izbyshev@ispras.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=shasta@toxcorp.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.