From: pavel@denx.de (Pavel Machek)
To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Subject: [cip-dev] Regarding backporting RTC PCF85263 driver to cip 4.4 kernel
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 23:46:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190714214606.GA19428@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OSBPR01MB210389D3E16B7A69C24ADF0EB8F20@OSBPR01MB2103.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hi!
>
> RTC PCF85263 is used by iWave RZ/G1C SBC( iwg23s) platform. We have upstreamed this driver support on 4.19 kernel [1]
> [1]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c?h=v5.2&id=fc979933bcf162595b6004d0de4effb64c323152
>
> This driver is based on RTC PCF 85363 driver which has rtc nvmem/alarm support [2] . Rtc nvmem framework is introduced in 4.13
> [2]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c?h=v5.2&id=a9687aa2764dd2669602bd19dc636cbeef5293d5
>
> We are seeing the following options for backporting this driver to
> 4.4 kernel
First, you did a lot of work there...
> Option 1:
> Backport this driver[1] to 4.4 kernel along with nvmem/alarm support. we have already done this work and patches are available at [3]
> [3]. https://gitlab.com/bijud/pcf85263/tree/master
Ok, this is rather long/big series, and some parts are quite scary:
https://gitlab.com/bijud/pcf85263/blob/master/0013-rtc-nvmem-allow-registering-the-nvmem-device-before-.patch
> Option 2:
> Backport RTC PCF85263 driver, removing Alarm/nvmem functionality
> from [2] .
So we basically get this one, and few patches on top, local to the new files.
https://gitlab.com/bijud/pcf85263/blob/master/0015-rtc-add-support-for-NXP-PCF85363-real-time-clock.patch
I think I prefer option 2.
> Option 3:
> Don't backport RTC support at all.
Applying patch #15 is easy. We can do option 2 I believe.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20190714/47a6b486/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-14 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 11:28 [cip-dev] Regarding backporting RTC PCF85263 driver to cip 4.4 kernel Biju Das
2019-07-14 21:46 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2019-07-14 22:48 ` nobuhiro1.iwamatsu at toshiba.co.jp
2019-07-15 6:45 ` Biju Das
2019-07-15 6:43 ` Biju Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190714214606.GA19428@amd \
--to=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.