From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: add callback of .cleanup_rq Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:45:21 +0000 Message-ID: <20190719004521.D81BC21850@mail.kernel.org> References: <20190718032519.28306-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190718032519.28306-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Sasha Levin , Ming Lei , Jens Axboe Cc: Hannes Reinecke , Bart Van Assche , Mike Snitzer , "Ewan D. Milne" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig List-Id: dm-devel.ids Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 396eaf21ee17 blk-mq: improve DM's blk-mq IO merging via blk_insert_cloned_request feedback. The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.1, v5.1.18, v4.19.59. v5.2.1: Build OK! v5.1.18: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 5de719e3d01b ("dm mpath: fix missing call of path selector type->end_io") v4.19.59: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 36e765392e48 ("blk-mq: complete req in softirq context in case of single queue") 5de719e3d01b ("dm mpath: fix missing call of path selector type->end_io") 7b7ab780a048 ("block: make request_to_qc_t public") 9ba20527f4d1 ("blk-mq: provide mq_ops->busy() hook") c7bb9ad1744e ("block: get rid of q->softirq_done_fn()") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha