Re: [PATCH v9 4/8] sched/deadline: Fix bandwidth accounting at all levels after offline migration

[Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>]

On 22/07/19 13:07, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 7/19/19 3:59 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -557,6 +558,38 @@ static struct rq *dl_task_offline_migration(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p
> >  		double_lock_balance(rq, later_rq);
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (p->dl.dl_non_contending || p->dl.dl_throttled) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Inactive timer is armed (or callback is running, but
> > +		 * waiting for us to release rq locks). In any case, when it
> > +		 * will file (or continue), it will see running_bw of this
> 
> s/file/fire ?

Yep.

> > +		 * task migrated to later_rq (and correctly handle it).
> 
> Is this because of dl_task_timer()->enqueue_task_dl()->task_contending()
> setting dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0 ?

No, this is related to inactive_task_timer() callback. Since the task is
migrated (by this function calling set_task_cpu()) because a CPU hotplug
operation happened, we need to reflect this w.r.t. running_bw, or
inactive_task_timer() might sub from the new CPU and cause running_bw to
underflow.

Thanks,

Juri