From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm/memcontrol: reclaim severe usage over high limit in get_user_pages loop
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:55:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190729185509.GI9330@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190729154952.GC21958@cmpxchg.org>
On Mon 29-07-19 11:49:52, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 03:29:38PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > --- a/mm/gup.c
> > +++ b/mm/gup.c
> > @@ -847,8 +847,11 @@ static long __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > - cond_resched();
> >
> > + /* Reclaim memory over high limit before stocking too much */
> > + mem_cgroup_handle_over_high(true);
>
> I'd rather this remained part of the try_charge() call. The code
> comment in try_charge says this:
>
> * We can perform reclaim here if __GFP_RECLAIM but let's
> * always punt for simplicity and so that GFP_KERNEL can
> * consistently be used during reclaim.
>
> The simplicity argument doesn't hold true anymore once we have to add
> manual calls into allocation sites. We should instead fix try_charge()
> to do synchronous reclaim for __GFP_RECLAIM and only punt to userspace
> return when actually needed.
Agreed. If we want to do direct reclaim on the high limit breach then it
should go into try_charge same way we do hard limit reclaim there. I am
not yet sure about how/whether to scale the excess. The only reason to
move reclaim to return-to-userspace path was GFP_NOWAIT charges. As you
say, maybe we should start by always performing the reclaim for
sleepable contexts first and only defer for non-sleeping requests.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-29 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-28 12:29 [PATCH RFC] mm/memcontrol: reclaim severe usage over high limit in get_user_pages loop Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-07-29 9:17 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-29 9:40 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-07-29 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-29 11:24 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-07-29 17:28 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-29 18:48 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-01 21:00 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-02 9:35 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-02 18:56 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-05 14:32 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-05 19:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-08-06 3:28 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-06 7:05 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-29 15:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-07-29 18:55 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-08-02 9:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-02 10:01 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-08-02 11:44 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 7:07 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 7:19 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-08-06 7:36 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190729185509.GI9330@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.