diff for duplicates of <20190730062651.GA29518@lst.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 7ceca97..bf7d87d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -21,7 +21,3 @@ because it is common and failsafe vs the normal linux assumptions. However the ia64 SGI SN2 platform, and the powerpc IBM ebus implementations seem to require a 64-bit mask already, so we keep that behavior as is. -_______________________________________________ -iommu mailing list -iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org -https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index fa7d86e..2925d2f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,19 +5,20 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 4/5] dma-mapping: provide a better default ->get_required_mask\0" "Date\0Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:26:51 +0200\0" "To\0Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>\0" - "Cc\0linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org" + "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" + Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> + Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> + Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> + Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> + Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> + linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org> Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org> Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org> - Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> + linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org> - linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org> - Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> - Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - " Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + " Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:57:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:\n" @@ -42,10 +43,6 @@ "because it is common and failsafe vs the normal linux assumptions.\n" "However the ia64 SGI SN2 platform, and the powerpc IBM ebus\n" "implementations seem to require a 64-bit mask already, so we keep that\n" - "behavior as is.\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "iommu mailing list\n" - "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" - https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu + behavior as is. -3d401fa778a923575d329372cb54395a8e2b7cf0d9c8d6ab2cad93be2b5ed908 +09a4464c2adb55d1db80f158bb1ee4113292e685cf28064bd069882a04169c1e
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 7ceca97..bf7d87d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -21,7 +21,3 @@ because it is common and failsafe vs the normal linux assumptions. However the ia64 SGI SN2 platform, and the powerpc IBM ebus implementations seem to require a 64-bit mask already, so we keep that behavior as is. -_______________________________________________ -iommu mailing list -iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org -https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index fa7d86e..2736685 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\0CAMuHMdUBPj8AVSuDwaBB_4gRD6k7vzo0WAFJEkTUbxSw31bzUg@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 4/5] dma-mapping: provide a better default ->get_required_mask\0" - "Date\0Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:26:51 +0200\0" + "Date\0Tue, 30 Jul 2019 06:26:51 +0000\0" "To\0Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>\0" "Cc\0linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org" Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - " Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> + " Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:57:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:\n" @@ -42,10 +43,6 @@ "because it is common and failsafe vs the normal linux assumptions.\n" "However the ia64 SGI SN2 platform, and the powerpc IBM ebus\n" "implementations seem to require a 64-bit mask already, so we keep that\n" - "behavior as is.\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "iommu mailing list\n" - "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" - https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu + behavior as is. -3d401fa778a923575d329372cb54395a8e2b7cf0d9c8d6ab2cad93be2b5ed908 +1085acf81bb96f4f6ecd23728fa3cf8d0144aff26dea976a46d2f03f2d447590
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index 7ceca97..bf7d87d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -21,7 +21,3 @@ because it is common and failsafe vs the normal linux assumptions. However the ia64 SGI SN2 platform, and the powerpc IBM ebus implementations seem to require a 64-bit mask already, so we keep that behavior as is. -_______________________________________________ -iommu mailing list -iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org -https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index fa7d86e..75dc8fd 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - " Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> + " Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:57:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:\n" @@ -42,10 +43,6 @@ "because it is common and failsafe vs the normal linux assumptions.\n" "However the ia64 SGI SN2 platform, and the powerpc IBM ebus\n" "implementations seem to require a 64-bit mask already, so we keep that\n" - "behavior as is.\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "iommu mailing list\n" - "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" - https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu + behavior as is. -3d401fa778a923575d329372cb54395a8e2b7cf0d9c8d6ab2cad93be2b5ed908 +02c6261a6b369c5b253f98f42c73305d5e3c8a6283f23f37793f3c5972f526d2
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N4/1.txt index 7ceca97..38ef5e8 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N4/1.txt @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ because it is common and failsafe vs the normal linux assumptions. However the ia64 SGI SN2 platform, and the powerpc IBM ebus implementations seem to require a 64-bit mask already, so we keep that behavior as is. + _______________________________________________ -iommu mailing list -iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org -https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N4/content_digest index fa7d86e..4412f96 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N4/content_digest @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - " Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> + " Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:57:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:\n" @@ -43,9 +44,10 @@ "However the ia64 SGI SN2 platform, and the powerpc IBM ebus\n" "implementations seem to require a 64-bit mask already, so we keep that\n" "behavior as is.\n" + "\n" "_______________________________________________\n" - "iommu mailing list\n" - "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" - https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -3d401fa778a923575d329372cb54395a8e2b7cf0d9c8d6ab2cad93be2b5ed908 +0fb7dcfe31f91c6e639f646b7e05660fd6bb8ed4f7d3ace51ad2194018efdc9f
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.