From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG, ERG}
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:40:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730144020.3518-1-will@kernel.org> (raw)
If CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} are 0b0000 then they must be interpreted to have
their architecturally maximum values, which defeats the use of
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when sanitising CPU ID registers on heterogeneous
machines.
Introduce FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE so that these fields effectively
saturate at zero.
Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Fixes: 3c739b571084 ("arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers")
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 7 ++++---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 8 ++++++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 407e2bf23676..c96ffa4722d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -35,9 +35,10 @@
*/
enum ftr_type {
- FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */
- FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */
- FTR_HIGHER_SAFE,/* Bigger value is safe */
+ FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */
+ FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */
+ FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe */
+ FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe, but 0 is biggest */
};
#define FTR_STRICT true /* SANITY check strict matching required */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index f29f36a65175..d19d14ba9ae4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 31, 1, 1), /* RES1 */
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_DIC_SHIFT, 1, 1),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_IDC_SHIFT, 1, 1),
- ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, CTR_CWG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
- ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, CTR_ERG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+ ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, CTR_CWG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+ ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, CTR_ERG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_DMINLINE_SHIFT, 4, 1),
/*
* Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will
@@ -468,6 +468,10 @@ static s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new,
case FTR_LOWER_SAFE:
ret = new < cur ? new : cur;
break;
+ case FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE:
+ if (!cur || !new)
+ break;
+ /* Fallthrough */
case FTR_HIGHER_SAFE:
ret = new > cur ? new : cur;
break;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2019-07-30 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-30 14:40 Will Deacon [this message]
2019-07-30 14:45 ` [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} Suzuki K Poulose
2019-07-30 16:53 ` [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG, ERG} Mark Rutland
2019-07-31 17:11 ` [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} Catalin Marinas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-08-05 17:14 Will Deacon
2019-08-07 15:52 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190730144020.3518-1-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.