From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] nouveau: pass struct nouveau_svmm to nouveau_range_fault Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:40:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20190730144023.GA6683@lst.de> References: <20190730055203.28467-1-hch@lst.de> <20190730055203.28467-4-hch@lst.de> <20190730123554.GD24038@mellanox.com> <20190730131038.GB4566@lst.de> <20190730131454.GG24038@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190730131454.GG24038@mellanox.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Ben Skeggs , Felix Kuehling , Ralph Campbell , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: amd-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:14:58PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I have a patch deleting hmm->mm, so using svmm seems cleaner churn > here, we could defer and I can fold this into that patch? Sounds good. If I don't need to resend feel fee to fold it, otherwise I'll fix it up.