From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ReST conversion patches not applied yet Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:26:13 -0300 Message-ID: <20190731172613.32d65ad8@coco.lan> References: <20190731141734.1fa9ce64@lwn.net> <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , Dave Kleikamp , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , Maxime Ripard , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Evgeniy Polyakov , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Jonathan Corbet , Alexander Shishkin , Chen-Yu Tsai , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Evgeniy Dushistov , Suzuki K Poulose , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mathieu Poirier , samba-technical@lists.samba.org, Liam Girdwood linux List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Em Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:20:07 +0100 Mark Brown escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > As promised, this is the rebased version of the patches that were not applied > > > from the /26 patch series because you had merge conflicts. > > > > > > They're all based on your docs-next branch, so should apply fine. > > > > > > The first one fixes all but one error with a broken reference. > > > > > > The only broken reference right now is due to a DT patch with was not > > > accepted (no idea why), but whose driver is upstream. > > > All but 5/6 applied, thanks. > > Oh, I still hadn't reviewed this version of the SPI stuff :( It is basically the one sent on that /26 patch series, just rebased on the top of docs-next. > There were outstanding questions about where it was going to get moved > to but if I read the diff correctly it looks like it didn't actually get > moved in the end? Yeah, it doesn't have the move. My understanding from our discussions is that we didn't reach a conclusion. In any case, I can send a separate patch with the move part once we reach an agreement about what's the best way to proceed (or you can do it directly, if you prefer so). Thanks, Mauro From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CE1C433FF for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C83F206A3 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564604790; bh=HiSDpvUG1X9DzOota6oWFEr3hP3pdZfxExJeEHf3noc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=I3pLc0GrFVkzQPd33QBimQThOUHnZ9gVtl5iS+F1geBEX4/j6QNw+xRhYKBgcaF5e vCsO7QuR4zMJgDLsb17L9PgjgTZ/TR+vDwXfNwJSmi/wHb2FDqgW0imfpi+54ga55Z mT71DWIzLWG9v9MnCjilIJbX5G9iha3y3oAGvQ4U= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730424AbfGaU00 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:26:26 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:58118 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728232AbfGaU00 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:26:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+a5BC2SMQTZyNnosj2+NVoaE/cuHtdCJLsTbfMI7CM8=; b=cd0EZcQkx68qz1mV7MZC2uM8w P5cYOfzRqT4jAj1XeIa5cZwCKRpuEARrsXGCDxCq8sgpCmoEJ8VyMoB1ZGWIv3KkGkC8AIFMmG3zu rlsmWUq3FLoiDUPohjPULvC4w5BLIzEmbwgXzpFT+L80k80QNHwktIQFstvBvlBiAagdTYKLP7kd6 mgvL4iD+sHmcbJxX4pbsqTYJFd9WsDq0iZww0LtIbpC3Rwlt6XCZ+VcKY2odTaplLXORSAqBC7jw+ ktYQ73C/T59Q53D5UHvn8GEbIRSj5leo+helE+/aJGkkXgpqWFvenf2ZTIwIz7KLtjIJb7x/x8Xk3 8x9hawtXg==; Received: from [191.33.152.89] (helo=coco.lan) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hsvB0-0001Q8-KC; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:22 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:26:13 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Mark Brown Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Maxime Ripard , samba-technical@lists.samba.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Evgeniy Dushistov , Jonathan Cameron , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Steve French , Alexander Shishkin , Chen-Yu Tsai , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp , Mark Rutland , Evgeniy Polyakov , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Hartmut Knaack , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ReST conversion patches not applied yet Message-ID: <20190731172613.32d65ad8@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> References: <20190731141734.1fa9ce64@lwn.net> <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:20:07 +0100 Mark Brown escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > As promised, this is the rebased version of the patches that were not applied > > > from the /26 patch series because you had merge conflicts. > > > > > > They're all based on your docs-next branch, so should apply fine. > > > > > > The first one fixes all but one error with a broken reference. > > > > > > The only broken reference right now is due to a DT patch with was not > > > accepted (no idea why), but whose driver is upstream. > > > All but 5/6 applied, thanks. > > Oh, I still hadn't reviewed this version of the SPI stuff :( It is basically the one sent on that /26 patch series, just rebased on the top of docs-next. > There were outstanding questions about where it was going to get moved > to but if I read the diff correctly it looks like it didn't actually get > moved in the end? Yeah, it doesn't have the move. My understanding from our discussions is that we didn't reach a conclusion. In any case, I can send a separate patch with the move part once we reach an agreement about what's the best way to proceed (or you can do it directly, if you prefer so). Thanks, Mauro From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ReST conversion patches not applied yet Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:26:13 -0300 Message-ID: <20190731172613.32d65ad8@coco.lan> References: <20190731141734.1fa9ce64@lwn.net> <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Rutland , Dave Kleikamp , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , Maxime Ripard , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Evgeniy Polyakov , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Jonathan Corbet , Alexander Shishkin , Chen-Yu Tsai , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Evgeniy Dushistov , Suzuki K Poulose , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mathieu Poirier , samba-technical@lists.samba.org, Liam Girdwood , linux To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Em Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:20:07 +0100 Mark Brown escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > As promised, this is the rebased version of the patches that were not applied > > > from the /26 patch series because you had merge conflicts. > > > > > > They're all based on your docs-next branch, so should apply fine. > > > > > > The first one fixes all but one error with a broken reference. > > > > > > The only broken reference right now is due to a DT patch with was not > > > accepted (no idea why), but whose driver is upstream. > > > All but 5/6 applied, thanks. > > Oh, I still hadn't reviewed this version of the SPI stuff :( It is basically the one sent on that /26 patch series, just rebased on the top of docs-next. > There were outstanding questions about where it was going to get moved > to but if I read the diff correctly it looks like it didn't actually get > moved in the end? Yeah, it doesn't have the move. My understanding from our discussions is that we didn't reach a conclusion. In any case, I can send a separate patch with the move part once we reach an agreement about what's the best way to proceed (or you can do it directly, if you prefer so). Thanks, Mauro From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E73C433FF for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F351206A3 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fjD5KVbZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2F351206A3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=PlLTM35ycqFI8M8QYGLPLp1Gcfg/5YoDBf+fjPi/en0=; b=fjD5KVbZ52OAVU seLoitP1GdmDrKX1tdZeug4vSMWCmnu002VzKgBmbTls2Eek2Gov0HuTTh8pFc7XLmxeUFEFqBNZs xAMg5jqdvE4lew0BaL0+HQakje1HJJ3MFKWXU3YbRTqJcrM8Grm+947ISOFVNbodMe+7yAGzByA2v CBrgYrhxoxvDpWkCcggKy6dFSwBdqaTVwknR/4amBW0XFHl2i81u/q9z2n0DFp6u2PJORHnih97g9 B69V+eNAuFAlKailmh+jFA0WK2OwMGsa+m/8BtT8EcCHG9sLiPeIlHkH9n3bghD3eoO4aqJwvu8gZ YS9YVCcFmVhnEYiZq8sg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hsvB4-0001QR-EV; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:26 +0000 Received: from [191.33.152.89] (helo=coco.lan) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hsvB0-0001Q8-KC; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:26:22 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:26:13 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ReST conversion patches not applied yet Message-ID: <20190731172613.32d65ad8@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> References: <20190731141734.1fa9ce64@lwn.net> <20190731202007.GI4369@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Dave Kleikamp , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , Maxime Ripard , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Evgeniy Polyakov , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Jonathan Corbet , Alexander Shishkin , Chen-Yu Tsai , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Evgeniy Dushistov , Suzuki K Poulose , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mathieu Poirier , samba-technical@lists.samba.org, Liam Girdwood , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Steve French , Hartmut Knaack , Jonathan Cameron Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Em Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:20:07 +0100 Mark Brown escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > As promised, this is the rebased version of the patches that were not applied > > > from the /26 patch series because you had merge conflicts. > > > > > > They're all based on your docs-next branch, so should apply fine. > > > > > > The first one fixes all but one error with a broken reference. > > > > > > The only broken reference right now is due to a DT patch with was not > > > accepted (no idea why), but whose driver is upstream. > > > All but 5/6 applied, thanks. > > Oh, I still hadn't reviewed this version of the SPI stuff :( It is basically the one sent on that /26 patch series, just rebased on the top of docs-next. > There were outstanding questions about where it was going to get moved > to but if I read the diff correctly it looks like it didn't actually get > moved in the end? Yeah, it doesn't have the move. My understanding from our discussions is that we didn't reach a conclusion. In any case, I can send a separate patch with the move part once we reach an agreement about what's the best way to proceed (or you can do it directly, if you prefer so). Thanks, Mauro _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel