From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kbusch@kernel.org (Keith Busch) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:32:57 -0600 Subject: [PATCH rfc 1/2] nvme: don't remove namespace if revalidate failed because of controller reset In-Reply-To: <2f7535ab-3d45-b24d-1512-a937e16e620f@grimberg.me> References: <464bb489-552f-b67e-545d-48616a1e76dd@grimberg.me> <82a91815-f7ed-5931-58ac-5893e68cc940@grimberg.me> <8bd6d219-f4fd-de58-a341-257c6274eddd@grimberg.me> <2825eb74-1df5-5dd2-3e90-c696bc7fa3d1@grimberg.me> <20190730173048.GC13948@localhost.localdomain> <61445d6f-f4ca-f8d4-cef2-5bfe40aa1e7f@suse.de> <2f7535ab-3d45-b24d-1512-a937e16e620f@grimberg.me> Message-ID: <20190731193257.GB15643@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019@11:03:41AM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > I think I asked this but was not answered, why are we removing > the namespace at all? do others do the same thing (remove the > disk if revalidation fails)? If a namespace no longer exists, what do you want to do with it instead of removing it?