From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bench numa: Fix cpu0 binding
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:35:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190801143515.GB19710@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190801142642.28004-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Em Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 04:26:42PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> Michael reported an issue with perf bench numa failing with
> binding to cpu0 with '-0' option.
>
> # perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZcm0 --thp 1 -M 1 -ddd
> # Running 'numa/mem' benchmark:
>
> # Running main, "perf bench numa numa-mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZcm0 --thp 1 -M 1 -ddd"
> binding to node 0, mask: 0000000000000001 => -1
> perf: bench/numa.c:356: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
>
> This happens when the cpu0 is not part of node0,
> which is the benchmark assumption and we can see
> that's not the case for some powerpc servers.
>
> Using correct node for cpu0 binding.
Thanks, applied to perf/urgent.
- Arnaldo
> Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9m9j1xm3xjaa1sogvbva0o8i@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
> index a640ca7aaada..513cb2f2fa32 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
> @@ -379,8 +379,10 @@ static u8 *alloc_data(ssize_t bytes0, int map_flags,
>
> /* Allocate and initialize all memory on CPU#0: */
> if (init_cpu0) {
> - orig_mask = bind_to_node(0);
> - bind_to_memnode(0);
> + int node = numa_node_of_cpu(0);
> +
> + orig_mask = bind_to_node(node);
> + bind_to_memnode(node);
> }
>
> bytes = bytes0 + HPSIZE;
> --
> 2.21.0
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 14:26 [PATCH] perf bench numa: Fix cpu0 binding Jiri Olsa
2019-08-01 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2019-08-08 20:16 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190801143515.GB19710@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.