From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] x86/kvm: Handle task_work on VMENTER/EXIT
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:24:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190801162451.GE31538@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190801143657.887648487@linutronix.de>
On 08/01, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> @@ -8172,6 +8174,10 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcp
> ++vcpu->stat.signal_exits;
> break;
> }
> +
> + if (notify_resume_pending())
> + tracehook_handle_notify_resume();
shouldn't you drop kvm->srcu before tracehook_handle_notify_resume() ?
I don't understand this code at all, but vcpu_run() does this even before
cond_resched().
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 14:32 [patch 0/5] posix-cpu-timers: Move expiry into task work context Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 1/5] tracehook: Provide TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME handling for KVM Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-01 15:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 17:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 2/5] x86/kvm: Handle task_work on VMENTER/EXIT Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 16:24 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-08-01 18:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 21:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-01 21:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-01 21:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 21:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-02 21:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-02 22:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-02 22:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-08-02 12:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 3/5] posix-cpu-timers: Split run_posix_cpu_timers() Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 4/5] posix-cpu-timers: Defer timer handling to task_work Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-01 15:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 15:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-08-01 18:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 14:32 ` [patch 5/5] x86: Select POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190801162451.GE31538@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.