All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20190805174659.GA23928@tuxbook-pro>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index d855088..42c617a 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ system that uses both request() and request_specific() will be suffering
 from intermittent failures due to probe ordering.
 
 > one:
->    -hwspin_lock_request() -> returns Id#0 (exclusive)
->    -hwspin_lock_request() -> returns Id#1 (exclusive)
->    -hwspin_lock_request_specific(0) -> returns Id#0 and makes Id#0 shared
+>  � -hwspin_lock_request() -> returns Id#0 (exclusive)
+>  � -hwspin_lock_request() -> returns Id#1 (exclusive)
+>  � -hwspin_lock_request_specific(0) -> returns Id#0 and makes Id#0 shared
 > Honestly I am not sure that this is a real issue, but it's better to have it
 > in mind before we take ay decision
 
@@ -103,9 +103,9 @@ It would be nice to have an upstream user of this API.
 > I can see three options:
 > 1- Keep my initial proposition
 > 2- Have hwspin_lock_request_specific() using shared locks and
->     hwspin_lock_request() using unused (so 'initially' exclusive) locks.
+>  �� hwspin_lock_request() using unused (so 'initially' exclusive) locks.
 > 3- Have hwspin_lock_request_specific() using shared locks and
->     remove/make deprecated hwspin_lock_request().
+>  �� remove/make deprecated hwspin_lock_request().
 > 
 > Just let me know what is your preference.
 > 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index d784c16..a224eaf 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  "ref\01a057176-81ab-e302-4375-2717ceef6924@st.com\0"
  "From\0Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 0/6] hwspinlock: allow sharing of hwspinlocks\0"
- "Date\0Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:46:59 -0700\0"
+ "Date\0Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:47:02 -0700\0"
  "To\0Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@st.com>\0"
  "Cc\0Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>"
   Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
@@ -100,9 +100,9 @@
  "from intermittent failures due to probe ordering.\n"
  "\n"
  "> one:\n"
- ">  \302\240 -hwspin_lock_request() -> returns Id#0 (exclusive)\n"
- ">  \302\240 -hwspin_lock_request() -> returns Id#1 (exclusive)\n"
- ">  \302\240 -hwspin_lock_request_specific(0) -> returns Id#0 and makes Id#0 shared\n"
+ ">  \303\257\302\277\302\275 -hwspin_lock_request() -> returns Id#0 (exclusive)\n"
+ ">  \303\257\302\277\302\275 -hwspin_lock_request() -> returns Id#1 (exclusive)\n"
+ ">  \303\257\302\277\302\275 -hwspin_lock_request_specific(0) -> returns Id#0 and makes Id#0 shared\n"
  "> Honestly I am not sure that this is a real issue, but it's better to have it\n"
  "> in mind before we take ay decision\n"
  "\n"
@@ -125,9 +125,9 @@
  "> I can see three options:\n"
  "> 1- Keep my initial proposition\n"
  "> 2- Have hwspin_lock_request_specific() using shared locks and\n"
- ">  \302\240\302\240 hwspin_lock_request() using unused (so 'initially' exclusive) locks.\n"
+ ">  \303\257\302\277\302\275\303\257\302\277\302\275 hwspin_lock_request() using unused (so 'initially' exclusive) locks.\n"
  "> 3- Have hwspin_lock_request_specific() using shared locks and\n"
- ">  \302\240\302\240 remove/make deprecated hwspin_lock_request().\n"
+ ">  \303\257\302\277\302\275\303\257\302\277\302\275 remove/make deprecated hwspin_lock_request().\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Just let me know what is your preference.\n"
  "> \n"
@@ -167,4 +167,4 @@
  "> >> 2.7.4\n"
  > >>
 
-8eefd93930163d90b999e064d60b5de4e93a82982803a693beaa882d336bd8b8
+72968cd9a4ad0b29f089a6214cc1173eec78c6cdb9e001f4c9bfafaa6f17d1bf

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index d855088..a89fa12 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -144,3 +144,8 @@ Bjorn
 > >> -- 
 > >> 2.7.4
 > >>
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index d784c16..c4c2d4e 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -6,17 +6,17 @@
  "Date\0Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:46:59 -0700\0"
  "To\0Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@st.com>\0"
  "Cc\0Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>"
-  Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
-  Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
   Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
+  linux-doc@vger.kernel.org <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
   linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>
-  devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+  devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
+  Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
+  Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
   linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>
   linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
-  linux-doc@vger.kernel.org <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
  " Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
@@ -165,6 +165,11 @@
  "> >>\n"
  "> >> -- \n"
  "> >> 2.7.4\n"
- > >>
+ "> >>\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-8eefd93930163d90b999e064d60b5de4e93a82982803a693beaa882d336bd8b8
+1ad8dfd4b27a99c832e7c17938a89d404011a6c6b96689c49ce49965fed41ea2

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.