From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@netronome.com>,
Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>,
oss-drivers@netronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] nfp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 19:00:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190806170049.GA12269@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190806095008.57007f2f@cakuba.netronome.com>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:50:08AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:11:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
> >
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
> > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@netronome.com>
> > Cc: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
> > Cc: oss-drivers@netronome.com
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
>
> I take it this is the case since commit ff9fb72bc077 ("debugfs: return
> error values, not NULL")? I.e. v5.0? It'd be useful to know for backport
> purposes.
You were always safe to ignore debugfs calls before that, but in 5.0 and
then 5.2 we got a bit more "robust" with some internal debugfs logic to
make it even easier. These can be backported to 2.6.11+ if you really
want to, no functionality should change.
But why would you want to backport them? This really isn't a "bugfix"
for a stable kernel. No one should ever noticed the difference except
for less memory being used.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-06 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-06 16:11 [PATCH 00/17] Networking driver debugfs cleanups Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 01/17] wimax: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 02/17] bonding: no need to print a message if debugfs_create_dir() fails Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 03/17] mlx5: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 19:41 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-06 19:47 ` gregkh
2019-08-06 20:37 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 04/17] xgbe: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:28 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 05/17] bnxt: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 06/17] cxgb4: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 07/17] hns3: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 08/17] nfp: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-06 17:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-08-06 17:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 09/17] stmmac: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 10/17] dpaa2: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 11/17] qca: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-08 6:30 ` Michael Heimpold
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 12/17] skge: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 17:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 13/17] mvpp2: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 14/17] fm10k: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 15/17] i40e: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 16/17] ixgbe: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 17/17] ieee802154: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 19:22 ` Stefan Schmidt
2019-08-06 19:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-09 1:37 ` [PATCH 00/17] Networking driver debugfs cleanups David Miller
2019-08-09 1:42 ` David Miller
2019-08-09 12:30 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190806170049.GA12269@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edwin.peer@netronome.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
--cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
--cc=tiny.windzz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.