From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: Fix indefinite loop in f2fs_gc()
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:54:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190807132448.GK8289@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <196c97bf-e846-794f-f4fe-0d1523a74575@huawei.com>
Hi Chao,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:29:24PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/8/7 16:52, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > Policy - Foreground GC, LFS and greedy GC mode.
> >
> > Under this policy, f2fs_gc() loops forever to GC as it doesn't have
> > enough free segements to proceed and thus it keeps calling gc_more
> > for the same victim segment. This can happen if the selected victim
> > segment could not be GC'd due to failed blkaddr validity check i.e.
> > is_alive() returns false for the blocks set in current validity map.
> >
> > Fix this by keeping track of such invalid segments and skip those
> > segments for selection in get_victim_by_default() to avoid endless
> > GC loop under such error scenarios.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > v3: address Chao's comments and also add logic to clear invalid_segmap
>
> Hi Sahitya,
>
> I meant we could cover all invalid_segmap related codes w/ CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> in upstream code, like we did for sit_info.sit_bitmap_mir. In private code
> (qualconn or others), if this issue happens frequently, we can enable it by
> default before it is fixed.
>
> How do you think?
>
Sure, we can do it that way.
> Btw, still no fsck log on broken image?
>
I have requested customers to provide this log next time when the issue is
reproduced again. I will update you once I get the log.
Thanks,
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > fs/f2fs/segment.h | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index 8974672..f7b9602 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -382,6 +382,14 @@ static int get_victim_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > nsearched++;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * skip selecting the invalid segno (that is failed due to block
> > + * validity check failure during GC) to avoid endless GC loop in
> > + * such cases.
> > + */
> > + if (test_bit(segno, sm->invalid_segmap))
> > + goto next;
> > +
> > secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
> >
> > if (sec_usage_check(sbi, secno))
> > @@ -602,8 +610,13 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> > {
> > struct page *node_page;
> > nid_t nid;
> > - unsigned int ofs_in_node;
> > + unsigned int ofs_in_node, segno;
> > block_t source_blkaddr;
> > + unsigned long offset;
> > + struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
> > +
> > + segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> > + offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
> >
> > nid = le32_to_cpu(sum->nid);
> > ofs_in_node = le16_to_cpu(sum->ofs_in_node);
> > @@ -627,8 +640,16 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> > source_blkaddr = datablock_addr(NULL, node_page, ofs_in_node);
> > f2fs_put_page(node_page, 1);
> >
> > - if (source_blkaddr != blkaddr)
> > + if (source_blkaddr != blkaddr) {
> > + if (unlikely(check_valid_map(sbi, segno, offset))) {
> > + if (!test_and_set_bit(segno, sit_i->invalid_segmap)) {
> > + f2fs_err(sbi, "mismatched blkaddr %u (source_blkaddr %u) in seg %u\n",
> > + blkaddr, source_blkaddr, segno);
> > + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> > + }
> > + }
> > return false;
> > + }
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index a661ac3..c3ba9e7 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -806,6 +806,7 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> > enum dirty_type dirty_type)
> > {
> > struct dirty_seglist_info *dirty_i = DIRTY_I(sbi);
> > + struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
> >
> > if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[dirty_type]))
> > dirty_i->nr_dirty[dirty_type]--;
> > @@ -817,9 +818,11 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> > if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[t]))
> > dirty_i->nr_dirty[t]--;
> >
> > - if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0)
> > + if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0) {
> > clear_bit(GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno),
> > dirty_i->victim_secmap);
> > + clear_bit(segno, sit_i->invalid_segmap);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -4017,6 +4020,10 @@ static int build_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > #endif
> >
> > + sit_i->invalid_segmap = f2fs_kvzalloc(sbi, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!sit_i->invalid_segmap)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > /* init SIT information */
> > sit_i->s_ops = &default_salloc_ops;
> >
> > @@ -4518,6 +4525,7 @@ static void destroy_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> > kvfree(sit_i->sit_bitmap_mir);
> > #endif
> > + kvfree(sit_i->invalid_segmap);
> > kvfree(sit_i);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > index b746028..3918155c 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > @@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ struct sit_info {
> > unsigned long long min_mtime; /* min. modification time */
> > unsigned long long max_mtime; /* max. modification time */
> >
> > + /* bitmap of segments to be ignored by GC in case of errors */
> > + unsigned long *invalid_segmap;
> > +
> > unsigned int last_victim[MAX_GC_POLICY]; /* last victim segment # */
> > };
> >
> >
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stummala@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: Fix indefinite loop in f2fs_gc()
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:54:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190807132448.GK8289@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <196c97bf-e846-794f-f4fe-0d1523a74575@huawei.com>
Hi Chao,
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:29:24PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/8/7 16:52, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > Policy - Foreground GC, LFS and greedy GC mode.
> >
> > Under this policy, f2fs_gc() loops forever to GC as it doesn't have
> > enough free segements to proceed and thus it keeps calling gc_more
> > for the same victim segment. This can happen if the selected victim
> > segment could not be GC'd due to failed blkaddr validity check i.e.
> > is_alive() returns false for the blocks set in current validity map.
> >
> > Fix this by keeping track of such invalid segments and skip those
> > segments for selection in get_victim_by_default() to avoid endless
> > GC loop under such error scenarios.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > v3: address Chao's comments and also add logic to clear invalid_segmap
>
> Hi Sahitya,
>
> I meant we could cover all invalid_segmap related codes w/ CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> in upstream code, like we did for sit_info.sit_bitmap_mir. In private code
> (qualconn or others), if this issue happens frequently, we can enable it by
> default before it is fixed.
>
> How do you think?
>
Sure, we can do it that way.
> Btw, still no fsck log on broken image?
>
I have requested customers to provide this log next time when the issue is
reproduced again. I will update you once I get the log.
Thanks,
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > fs/f2fs/segment.h | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index 8974672..f7b9602 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -382,6 +382,14 @@ static int get_victim_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > nsearched++;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * skip selecting the invalid segno (that is failed due to block
> > + * validity check failure during GC) to avoid endless GC loop in
> > + * such cases.
> > + */
> > + if (test_bit(segno, sm->invalid_segmap))
> > + goto next;
> > +
> > secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
> >
> > if (sec_usage_check(sbi, secno))
> > @@ -602,8 +610,13 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> > {
> > struct page *node_page;
> > nid_t nid;
> > - unsigned int ofs_in_node;
> > + unsigned int ofs_in_node, segno;
> > block_t source_blkaddr;
> > + unsigned long offset;
> > + struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
> > +
> > + segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> > + offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
> >
> > nid = le32_to_cpu(sum->nid);
> > ofs_in_node = le16_to_cpu(sum->ofs_in_node);
> > @@ -627,8 +640,16 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> > source_blkaddr = datablock_addr(NULL, node_page, ofs_in_node);
> > f2fs_put_page(node_page, 1);
> >
> > - if (source_blkaddr != blkaddr)
> > + if (source_blkaddr != blkaddr) {
> > + if (unlikely(check_valid_map(sbi, segno, offset))) {
> > + if (!test_and_set_bit(segno, sit_i->invalid_segmap)) {
> > + f2fs_err(sbi, "mismatched blkaddr %u (source_blkaddr %u) in seg %u\n",
> > + blkaddr, source_blkaddr, segno);
> > + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> > + }
> > + }
> > return false;
> > + }
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index a661ac3..c3ba9e7 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -806,6 +806,7 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> > enum dirty_type dirty_type)
> > {
> > struct dirty_seglist_info *dirty_i = DIRTY_I(sbi);
> > + struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
> >
> > if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[dirty_type]))
> > dirty_i->nr_dirty[dirty_type]--;
> > @@ -817,9 +818,11 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> > if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[t]))
> > dirty_i->nr_dirty[t]--;
> >
> > - if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0)
> > + if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0) {
> > clear_bit(GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno),
> > dirty_i->victim_secmap);
> > + clear_bit(segno, sit_i->invalid_segmap);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -4017,6 +4020,10 @@ static int build_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > #endif
> >
> > + sit_i->invalid_segmap = f2fs_kvzalloc(sbi, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!sit_i->invalid_segmap)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > /* init SIT information */
> > sit_i->s_ops = &default_salloc_ops;
> >
> > @@ -4518,6 +4525,7 @@ static void destroy_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> > kvfree(sit_i->sit_bitmap_mir);
> > #endif
> > + kvfree(sit_i->invalid_segmap);
> > kvfree(sit_i);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > index b746028..3918155c 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > @@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ struct sit_info {
> > unsigned long long min_mtime; /* min. modification time */
> > unsigned long long max_mtime; /* max. modification time */
> >
> > + /* bitmap of segments to be ignored by GC in case of errors */
> > + unsigned long *invalid_segmap;
> > +
> > unsigned int last_victim[MAX_GC_POLICY]; /* last victim segment # */
> > };
> >
> >
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-07 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 8:52 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: Fix indefinite loop in f2fs_gc() Sahitya Tummala
2019-08-07 8:52 ` Sahitya Tummala
2019-08-07 9:29 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2019-08-07 9:29 ` Chao Yu
2019-08-07 13:24 ` Sahitya Tummala [this message]
2019-08-07 13:24 ` Sahitya Tummala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190807132448.GK8289@codeaurora.org \
--to=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.