All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 7/9] vhost: do not use RCU to synchronize MMU notifier with worker
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:05:25 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808130525.GA1989@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1000f8a3-19a9-0383-61e5-ba08ddc9fcba@redhat.com>

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:54:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

> I don't have any objection to convert  to spinlock() but just want to
> know if any case that the above smp_mb() + counter looks good to you?

This email is horribly mangled, but I don't think mixing smb_mb() and
smp_load_acquire() would be considerd a best-practice, and using
smp_store_release() instead would be the wrong barrier.

spinlock does seem to be the only existing locking primitive that does
what is needed here.

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-08 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-07  7:06 [PATCH V4 0/9] Fixes for metadata accelreation Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 1/9] vhost: don't set uaddr for invalid address Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 2/9] vhost: validate MMU notifier registration Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 3/9] vhost: fix vhost map leak Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 4/9] vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr() Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06   ` Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 5/9] vhost: mark dirty pages during map uninit Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06   ` Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 6/9] vhost: don't do synchronize_rcu() in vhost_uninit_vq_maps() Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 7/9] vhost: do not use RCU to synchronize MMU notifier with worker Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-07 12:07   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-07 12:07   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-07 14:02     ` Jason Wang
2019-08-08 12:54       ` Jason Wang
2019-08-08 12:54       ` Jason Wang
2019-08-08 13:01         ` Jason Wang
2019-08-08 13:01           ` Jason Wang
2019-08-08 13:01         ` Jason Wang
2019-08-08 13:05         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-08 13:05         ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-08-10 19:12         ` [PATCH V5 0/9] Fixes for vhost metadata acceleration Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-08-10 19:12           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-08-07 14:02     ` [PATCH V4 7/9] vhost: do not use RCU to synchronize MMU notifier with worker Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 8/9] vhost: correctly set dirty pages in MMU notifiers callback Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` [PATCH V4 9/9] vhost: do not return -EAGAIN for non blocking invalidation too early Jason Wang
2019-08-07  7:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-09  5:15 ` [PATCH V4 0/9] Fixes for metadata accelreation David Miller
2019-08-09  5:35   ` Jason Wang
2019-08-09  5:35   ` Jason Wang
2019-08-09  5:15 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190808130525.GA1989@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.