[PATCH 4.4 02/21] arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG}

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

commit 147b9635e6347104b91f48ca9dca61eb0fbf2a54 upstream.

If CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} are 0b0000 then they must be interpreted to have
their architecturally maximum values, which defeats the use of
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when sanitising CPU ID registers on heterogeneous
machines.

Introduce FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE so that these fields effectively
saturate at zero.

Fixes: 3c739b571084 ("arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4.y only
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 7 ++++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index ad83c245781c3..0a66f8241f185 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -41,9 +41,10 @@
 
 /* CPU feature register tracking */
 enum ftr_type {
-	FTR_EXACT,	/* Use a predefined safe value */
-	FTR_LOWER_SAFE,	/* Smaller value is safe */
-	FTR_HIGHER_SAFE,/* Bigger value is safe */
+	FTR_EXACT,			/* Use a predefined safe value */
+	FTR_LOWER_SAFE,			/* Smaller value is safe */
+	FTR_HIGHER_SAFE,		/* Bigger value is safe */
+	FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE,	/* Bigger value is safe, but 0 is biggest */
 };
 
 #define FTR_STRICT	true	/* SANITY check strict matching required */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index fff0bf2f889e1..062484d344509 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ static struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 30, 1, 0),
 	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 29, 1, 1),	/* DIC */
 	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 1, 1),	/* IDC */
-	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0),	/* CWG */
-	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),	/* ERG */
+	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, 24, 4, 0),	/* CWG */
+	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),	/* ERG */
 	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 1),	/* DminLine */
 	/*
 	 * Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will
@@ -341,6 +341,10 @@ static s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new, s64 cur)
 	case FTR_LOWER_SAFE:
 		ret = new < cur ? new : cur;
 		break;
+	case FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE:
+		if (!cur || !new)
+			break;
+		/* Fallthrough */
 	case FTR_HIGHER_SAFE:
 		ret = new > cur ? new : cur;
 		break;
-- 
2.20.1